July 2002
posts
Here's a silly diversion... -- Darby, 07:27:20
07/21/02 Sun
What tv shows would the characters watch?
I quoted South Park with Anya down below, and I
absolutely believe Xander and she would have watched. But
what else would constitute the viewing habits of the Scooby
Gang, on those rare nights that the world is not in
peril?
It could be something reasonable, like Anya having the hots
for Louis Rukheyser, or metaphorical, like Buffy watching
Trading Spaces and sighing, or silly, like Willow
watching Martha Stewart to see how it's really done,
that taking over the world with Dark Powers thing.
Go nuts!
I think it's obvious that I'll be waiting for you
there...
[>
Re: Here's a silly diversion... -- Kitt,
11:09:50 07/21/02 Sun
Actually, for one charecter, that's easy: Xander.
If he can recognise Klingon love poetry from 3 feet away,
then we KNOW he watchs both Enterprise and all the other
Star Treks.
[> [>
Let's not forget the Babylon 5 commemorative
plates. -- Rahael, 11:18:18 07/21/02 Sun
[>
Re: Here's a silly diversion... -- Rob, 17:17:52
07/21/02 Sun
I would peg Buffy as a closet-Saved by the Bell
watcher, because her character is my age--and basically
every American teenager and young adult my age looks back on
Saved by the Bell fondly, and still sometimes
secretly catches it now and then on reruns on TBS. Also,
such a light, mindless view of high school would be the
perfect antidote to Buffy's more heady high school and then
college and post-college experiences.
Willow, I think, would get a kick out of Alias for no
particular reason but I still get a feeling she'd like it.
Xander--cartoons, definitely--I picture him watching Tom
and Jerry, with Anya sitting beside him, perplexed.
Secret favorite show, though? Sex and the City. Just
trust me on that one. lol
Anya's favorite show? Would have to be the Suzie Orman
business make lots of money show on CNN or MSNBC, or
whatever that is...
Giles, one might assume would love a stuffy show like
Masterpiece Theatre but I'd say no. I think he loves
The X-Files, except for the final season. ;o)
And we all know about Spike's Passions obsession!
Rob
[>
Re: Here's a silly diversion... -- d'Herblay,
17:55:11 07/21/02 Sun
I know Xander was, like me, a fan of the cult
favorite Night Stand!, because in "Nightmares," he
delivers the line "What can I say? I'm sick. I need help" in
a perfect imitation of that show's alcoholic, drug-addict,
sex-addict lowlife Bob.
For some reason, I like to think that Dawn and Spike sit
around watching The Powerpuff Girls. Spike jokingly
calls Dawn "Blossom," and Dawn responds, "I want to be
Buttercup!" because that's who she identifies with but Spike
secretly has a crush on the raven-haired spitfire and isn't
going there. (This may be projection.)
Clem is so obviously a big West Wing fan. And
Antiques Roadshow. And Dr. Quinn, Medicine
Woman.
The Mayor must have had his TV set permanently to American
Movie Classics. They just don't make them like they used to
anymore. And when Robin and the 7 Hoods came on for
the eighteenth time that month, he liked to sing along with
Sammy and Dean to "Mr. Booze."
Holtz really never understood TV. Sahjhan really, really
tried to get him into Freaky Links though.
Ethan Rayne I see as watching Molto Mario on the Food
Channel. And when he's home in England?
Countdown!
The Sisters of Jhe like to watch The View and plan a
bloody end for Meredith Vieira.
And should any network try to put a show on the air about
vampires and demons and the woman who slays them, the
audience in Sunnydale will laugh it right off the
schedule.
[> [>
Maybe the Scoobies are watching Angel. -- JCC,
02:26:09 07/22/02 Mon
And who plays Daphne in "Scooby Doo" in the
Buffyverse? Does SMG exist? What about the
rest? What show is on Tuesdays at 8pm on
UPN? Some things, man just aren't supposed
to know.
[>
Re: Here's a silly diversion... -- Lyonors,
07:02:13 07/22/02 Mon
I have this pet theory that Clem likes the Golden Girls and
sometimes even gets Spike to watch Murder She Wrote with
him....hehehehe
Ly
Sense and Sensibility & the noise factor (Part 1) -
- John Burwood, 08:04:14 07/21/02 Sun
There is a long thread down the board which covers, among
other things, why some people dislike Buffy the character
but love other characters more. Rufus pointed out that Joss
had said early on that people would find it harder to
identify with Buffy as the superhero, and I nearly posted
there, but I have an alternative theory on that so am
starting a new thread rather than hi-jacking the old
one.
In Sense & Sensibility, there is one scene where Elinor
hears sudden distressing news, & retreats into shocked
silence, her sister Marianne sees Elinor's silent distress &
breaks down in hysterical tears at the sight.
The result is that everyone rushes to comfort Marianne when
Elinor is the one who is really suffering.
It is almost a symbol for the whole novel - both sisters
suffer romantic grief, but Elinor internalises her pain &
gets on with what she has to & her duty to others whereas
Marianne indulges in an epic emotion trip - all her pain
open to the world the whole time.
Guess who gets all the sympathy throughout.
Remember Passion? When Buffy & Willow hear about Jenny's
death? I remember some people finding it odd that Joyce went
to comfort Willow instead of her own daughter, but actually
it was natural - because Buffy was sinking in silent shock,
but Willow was crying out loud - making the noise so she got
the attention.
Remember Tabula Rasa, when the SG talked about helping Buffy
deal, & Willow's spell kicked in to stop her. From that
point on, the SG seemed to forget about Buffy's distress as
Willow's break with Tara & magic problems took everyone's
attention.
Guess which was making the noise again?
But I am not Willow-bashing - will have to go on to Part 2
to make my point properly.
[>
Sense and Sensibility & the noise factor (mild S6
Spoilers)(Part 2) -- John Burwood, 08:48:23 07/21/02
Sun
The point I am making is that those who make the most noise
get the most attention - twas ever thus. And those who show
their feelings of distress get the most sympathy. And those
who show their concern tend to get credited with being more
caring. And so on.
Does not of course follow. Those who downplay their feelings
& get on with things are often the more responsible types
who put their duty to others first - like Elinor & Buffy -
yet those who let their emotions rip easily are often being
irresponsible & self-indulgent when doing so.
But yet it is only natural to judge people by what we see of
them. Emotions on the surface gain sympathy - failure to
show feelings tends to produce the assumption that they are
not felt - that the people are cold, insensitive or pompous,
etc.
Unfair - but natural. Buffy has always internalized her
pain, and rarely shared it, but stuck with her duty &
trying to do the right thing. Others like Willow & even more
Spike who operates almost entirely on his feelings with
little attempt to hide them are naturally more likely to
earn sympathy from those who watch them.
I remember some people disliking Buffy's speech in Villains
about not killing Warren, & denouncing it as self-righteous
- some even so far as to say good for Willow & Warren
deserved it.
Same factor - people naturally sympathize more with open
emotional reactions and actions than controlled reason.
Of course, doing the right & responsible - the superhero -
thing is mostly an exercise in not indulging your emotions &
controlling your actions - it is never going to be that
sympathetic.
IMHO anyway. What other comments - BTVS examples can others
come up with?
[> [>
Re: Sense and Sensibility & the noise factor (mild S6
Spoilers)(Part 2) -- Cactus Watcher, 09:44:10
07/21/02 Sun
I think you've got a very good point, John. It may be why I
like Buffy very well until the last few episodes of season
five, and have been impatient with her since. I come from
an extended family of people who internalize emotions in
public. My brother's sister has commented how strange and
out of place it felt to be the only one of many relatives
who cried at my father's funeral. Buffy, used to act like
someone from my family would, be more or less strong and
public and wait till having privacy to let it out. During
Buffy's long depression we haven't even seen her let it out
at all except very rarely. It's interesting that posters
that say they really liked last season, often say they can
empathize with Buffy's depression.
My example would be the scenes in "Innocence" when Giles is
probing Buffy to figure out what happened to make Angel turn
bad. The first time, Buffy is clearly distressed, even lets
out a tear, but she hurries away to be in private rather
than breaking down when Giles contines to prod. The second
time when Giles finally realizes what happened, she looks
hurt and guilty, but still quite strong.
[> [> [>
CW, your brother's sister? Is this one of those
riddles? -- Curious-but-strangely-cold Darby,
12:10:36 07/21/02 Sun
[> [> [> [>
Re: CW, your brother's sister? Is this one of those
riddles? -- Cactus Watcher, 16:40:32 07/21/02 Sun
Yes. How many time can you retype a post before it becomes
unreadable? Should be brother's wife or my sister-in-law.
Squeeze 'em together and you get ... Then, the master of
lousy proof reading, as usual, misses it.
[> [> [>
Depression involves numb feelings. -- Rahael,
12:12:52 07/21/02 Sun
[> [>
The Body/Forever -- MaeveRigan, 10:38:07
07/21/02 Sun
Although the viewers are allowed to see some of Buffy's
grief-stricken reactions to her mother's death--vomiting,
crying--she shows almost nothing to her friends or to Dawn.
Thus Dawn concludes that Buffy doesn't care that Joyce is
dead, when in fact, Buffy finally admits, when
confronted:
BUFFY: I didn't mean to push you away, I didn't. I just, I
couldn't let you see me.
Dawn begins to cry too.
[...]
BUFFY: (still crying) I don't know what we're gonna do. I'm
scared.
Trying to be the solitary hero just went nowhere in this
situation. Dawn ended up the hero of this one, but Buffy's
admission of vulnerability let us (and Dawn) love her.
BTW, in checking the dialogue quote, I noticed that Marti
wrote this episode.
[> [> [>
Re: The Body/Forever -- Jane's Addiction,
12:26:16 07/21/02 Sun
Forever was a great episode, and perhaps a bit overlooked in
the shadow of the groundbreaking greatness of
The Body(not just one of the best hours of Buffy, but one of
the best hours of television drama ever, IMHO).
That last scene was a wonderful example of Dawn (Buffy's
inner-child?) bringing out something in Buffy that no one
else could touch at that point.
But just a couple of episodes later, in Tough Love, Buffy
was giving Dawn the full 'Miss Minchin's Select Seminary for
Girls' treatment. Why? Because she understood the danger
they were facing (Little Dawn becomes a ward of the state or
goes to live with the father who couldn't be there for his
own children when they'd just lost their mother), though she
doesn't share that knowledge right away. Again, her first
instinct is to internalize and take everything on herself.
Poor Buffy. Even when dealing with tragically real life, non-
demonic challenges, she still has to be obsessed with this
idea of solitary duty and obligation.
Isn't that the reason that the writers have to have
characters like Dawn, Spike and Willow (though Willow has
hidden quite a lot, especially in this past season, even
from herself) that wear their emotions on their sleeve? From
the storytellers' perspective, they have to have characters
who can externalize things and bring more of the audience
along for the emotional journey.
[> [> [> [>
Sideline: Willow's hidden emotions -- MaeveRigan,
20:43:18 07/21/02 Sun
"though Willow has hidden quite a lot, especially in this
past season, even from herself"
I've always (well, maybe not always, but for a long time)
thought that the reason Willow doesn't sing a complete song
in OMWF can be very easily explained dramatically by this
point, which is quite coherent with her character
development. The fact that AH didn't want to/couldn't sing
might just as well be irrelevant, or was used very cleverly
by JW.
Willow is obviously unhappy that she only has one line and
"I think this line's mostly filler," but if we assume that
DarkWillow was speaking things that had been repressed in
the heart of NiceWillow, even if she had revealed them in a
cute, Shirley-Temple style tapdance routine--well, no
question about who the season's big bad was going to be!
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Sideline: Willow's hidden emotions -- Jane's
Addiction, 11:12:50 07/22/02 Mon
Exactly. With all the other characters unable to stop
themselves from literally singing out the truth, Willow's
silence seemed so evocative of just how deeply buried in her
subconscious her 'truth' was.
That's what has fascinated me about the Willow character
this season. Her issues seemed to be as well hidden from
herself as they were from her friends.
Was there one crushing blow that made her snap and sink into
darkness? I really don't think so. As devastating as Tara's
violent death may have been, I doubt it would've driven
Willow to the depths that it did had it not been preceeded
by each small step that came before. It was such a gradual,
subtle, emotionally realistic process and showed just how a
good person might be corrupted or driven insane by forces
that technically are within their control, but realistically
are not entirely in their control if only because they can't
always see the underlying emotional reasons behind their
choices. Or are afraid to look.
It's not as if Willow went directly from restoring Tara's
mind in season 5 to stealing part of her memory in season 6.
It was a long, gradual process. And each step - looked at in
the context of the moment and from Willow's perspective -
made sense. That's what makes it scary. No one can know with
certainty (ok - at least I can't) that they wouldn't make
similar mistakes in similar circumstances.
I believe Shadowkat has mentioned seeing a parallel to Sept.
11 in the Willow arc (intentional or unintentional), and I
tend to agree. Perhaps that's part of what has drawn me into
this particular arc this past season.
Sorry - this kind of rambled beyond the "Yeah, I noticed the
songless subtext too. Cool, huh?" bit that I meant to post.
Back to work now...
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Why deeply buried? -- Vickie, 12:56:28 07/22/02
Mon
These are great points about Willow in OMWF, but I wonder.
Could Willow's lack of a solo indicate her growing magical
power, and therefore ability to resist Sweet's influence?
Does this lack have to be Willow deeply burying her
feelings?
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Why deeply buried? -- Jane's Addiction,
15:39:42 07/22/02 Mon
That was my reading of the ep. But you're right - it's
entirely subjective. I just didn't see anything in that ep
that indicated she was knowingly hiding something,
unlike the chilling little smile when she pulled the forget
spell on Tara and later tried the spell on both Tara and
Buffy. And even that I saw as incredible hubris - thinking
she knew what was best for others - rather than the act of
some sort of mustache-twirling power mad "soon my electro
ray will destroy Metropolis" villain.
But I guess we really won't know until next season just who
is behind the curtain in Willow's mind.
Did you see anything in the ep that made it appear she was
consciously resisting Sweet's influence?
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
No, not consciously -- Vickie, 16:10:46 07/22/02
Mon
I don't know if you would HAVE to know about a magical
attack to resist it. (Shades of my role-playing days,
gads!)
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: No, not consciously -- Jane's Addiction,
17:05:55 07/22/02 Mon
I don't know about that role playing stuff. Well, there was
this one little summer hiatus Inquisition on the X-Files
board but that was years ago (and we only did it because no
one was expecting it...and we were bored).
Anyway, I'm feeling much better now and haven't denounced
anyone in, uhm, days ...
[> [>
Re: Sense and Sensibility & the noise factor (mild S6
Spoilers)(Part 2) -- Kitt, 11:44:39 07/21/02 Sun
Sorry to burst the bubble, but while Spike's emotional
outbursts make him easier to understand, that's not why I
identify with him a lot easier than Buffy. Let's face it,
whether as Spike or William, can any of us ever see him as
being part of the 'In' crowd? Yeah, he had minions, who he
bullied, but with the exception of Dru, do you think anybody
actually "had affection for" Spike before he started working
with the Scoobies? (ok, maybe Harmony, but he didn't like
her, so I don't think she counts). Now, cannon is that
before being called, Buffy was a 'popular girl.', and while
Xander and Willow were outsiders, the Scobbie Gang has
provided them with a setting where they are not just
accepted, but key members of the group.
Acceptance is something we all crave, no matter what we may
tell anyone; "I know I'm a monster, but you treat me like a
man, and that's..." Is it any wonder he loves her? She
accepts him. So does Dawn. Maybe Willow and Tara, and
that's it. For 100+ years, the only one who accepted him
was Dru, and see how much he was devastated by her
rejection? And the thing is, this struggle for acceptance,
this perenial outsider status? THIS is what I identify with
in Spike. A case of Been there, Done that, nice to see I'm
not the only one on the planet. That's why I respond to
Spike (and Willow, and even Xander for that matter) more
than Buffy.
[> [> [>
Acting like an outsider, and being an outsider --
Rahael, 11:56:31 07/21/02 Sun
These are two important differences.
Buffy may have once been 'popular', but only for her surface
appearance. Once her 'real' nature started slipping out, was
she popular? It is those who are ejected from the 'in' crowd
who sometimes suffer the most.
One of my closest friends is someone who is a perennial
insider. She went to expensive schools, with members of the
royal family. Her friends are well connected, she is rich.
She looks the part too - attractive, English rose looks. She
feels more of an outsider than me, educated in ordinary
schools, looking like a foreigner, and hell bent on 'not
belonging'.
She feels that people make assumptions about who she is, and
that she can never show the real person, the person who
cares about the world she lives in and gets angry about
injustice. Because then she would get rejected, not only by
acquaintances, but by her own family. That is a terrible
feeling. And she's still struggling with a depression that
cripples her life. Being in the in crowd, as Cordy pointed
out, can be as lonely as being out of it. Doesn't Buffy,
Willow and Xander find more acceptance with their real
friends, being who they really are, loved for who they
are?
As you yourself have pointed out, Spike has chosen himself
to disregard people who loved him. He treated Harmony as
callously, as coldly as any in crowd arrogant man toward a
'outsider' girl. He has his minions, he had Harmony,
Drusilla, his own little family. He likes walking alone,
being the big bad who doesn't need anyone.
And as for Buffy, Dawn, Tara etc who accept him, 'that's
it'? really? I would consider that richness.....to have such
people accept you. Especially for someone who isn't just a
lonely tragic figure rejected by society, but someone who
rejected society and cut a swathe of blood through it.
[> [> [>
cannon? -- Robert, 08:23:41 07/24/02 Wed
>> "Now, cannon is that before being called, Buffy was a
'popular girl.', ..."
Did you really mean to use the word "cannon", which
means;
1. A large heavy gun usually mounted on a carriage, a heavy-
caliber automatic aircraft gun firing explosive shells.
2. A loose, independently revolving metal sleeve that fits
over a shaft.
3. The projecting part of a bell by which it is hung.
4. A smooth round bit for a horse.
5. The large bone between the fetlock and knee or hock of
the horse and allied animals.
... or did you mean to use "canon", which means;
1. A rule or law; especially, a rule of faith and practice
enacted by a church council and, in the Roman Catholic
Church, ratified by the Pope; also a body of such rules or
laws.
2. An established rule; principle.
3. A standard for judgement; criterion.
4. The books of the bible recognized as the divinely
inspired rule of faith and practice.
5. The sacred books of any sect or religion.
6. A list, as of the recognized works of an author.
7. The list of canonized saints.
8. The portion of the Mass between the Sanctus and the
Lord's Prayer.
9. A composition or passage in which one or more voices
follow and imitate the melody of the first voice, the
various parts overlapping in time.
10. A size of type, 48-point.
[> [>
Very good post, John -- Caesar
Augustus, 16:59:07 07/21/02 Sun
This is true. Buffy's reaction in 'The Body', as pointed out
by MaeveRigan, was very stoic. People tend to see stoic
people as being strong, coping well with the death - when if
anything, the opposite is true. They are so hurt deep inside
that they have temporarily lost connection with the outer
world, and a part of them has almost died and is unable to
feel. They are very focused on the tasks at hand, such as
funerals, sympathising with loved ones, but still show a
huge amount of fatigue (shown by her meeting with Angel).
They may seem strong but they also tend not to get much
support or sympathy from those around because they are the
ones supporting and sympathising with others, feeling that
duty. Dawn attacks Buffy for not feeling, even tho Buffy has
been looking after Dawn.
Buffy's s6 status was almost a year-long extension of this
feeling. She was dead inside, couldn't communicate with her
friends, and looked for the only solace she could find in
Spike! As you said, it's natural for these people not to get
much sympathy from us - especially on a TV show, where one
expects emotions to be fairly out in the open - but it takes
someone who's been there to fully appreciate the process
that Buffy is going through, and actually sympathise with
her.
[> [> [>
Year long recovery -- Just George, 12:25:06
07/22/02 Mon
Caesar Augustus: "Buffy's s6 status was almost a year-long
extension of this feeling."
I have felt for a while that losing her mother was what put
Buffy over the edge into a state of depression. It has taken
her over a year to recover. Why was losing Joyce so much
harder than the other losses in S5?
* Losing Riley is a lot like losing Angel.
* Protecting Dawn is a lot like protecting the Scoobies.
* But losing Joyce was like nothing Buffy had ever dealt
with before. She had never lost someone that close, that
central to her life.
It is not a coincidence that Buffy's most powerful statement
of confidence in her abilities (Checkpoint) is soon followed
by her greatest loss (The Body.) The Jossverse is an ironic
universe. Declarations of universality or power are quickly
punished by circumstance.
Some people are annoyed with Buffy's numerous epiphanies in
Season 6. However, she had a number of issues to work
through. She could not move forward until each had been
dealt with:
* Not being there to save her mother
* Using/abusing Spike
* Ignoring/holding back Dawn
In some ways, all three can all be traced back to Buffy's
loss of her mother. Guilt for not saving Joyce is obviously
connected. But, what does Buffy get from Spike (other than
great sex?) Unconditional love, a type of support that she
hasn't had since Joyce died. What does Dawn represent to
Buffy? The last remaining connection to Joyce (one that must
be protected at all costs) and the burden of taking over as
Mom (a role that Joyce played so well.) Given that of these
can be tied to losing Joyce, I believe that the most
important of Buffy's Season 6 epiphanies was saying goodbye
to her mother in Normal Again.
[> [> [> [>
Re: Year long recovery -- leslie,
13:34:30 07/23/02 Tue
"But, what does Buffy get from Spike (other than great sex?)
Unconditional love, a type of support that she hasn't had
since Joyce died."
Joyce, who, for whatever confused reason, always kind of
liked Spike except for that first time when she whacked him
with the back of an axe...
Said it before, I'll say it again--they really missed a
wonderful chance by not making Spike fall in love with Joyce
instead of Buffy. Okay, I understand that that kind of thing
doesn't happen in TVland--fortysomething single mothers
don't get to screw dangerously sexy undead guys, especially
when there is a nubile heroine who happens to be their
daughter around--but, to go back to Marti's strange ideas of
what constitutes a good relationship, I certainly can see
Joyce and Spike sitting around the living room arguing--
amicably--over what to watch on tv.
[> [>
Re: Sense and Sensibility & the noise factor (mild S6
Spoilers)(Part 2) -- leslie,
13:24:03 07/23/02 Tue
I agree with the S&S comparison, but I think it's also
significant (and typical of JA) that Marianne's real
epiphany comes when she realizes that Elinor *does* feel
very strongly, as strongly as she, and thus a) not showing
emotion does not indicate lack of emotion, and b) she has
been able to indulge her own emotionalism *because* of
Elinor's stoicism--she's been taking advantage of it. And
Marianne's happy ending occurs because she tries to be more
like Elinor from this point on. Even though JA acknowledges
that the squeaky wheel gets the grease, as long as she's in
charge, she makes sure that the quiet one eventually gets
her man (not only Elinor Dashwood, but also Anne Elliott in
Persuasion, Fanny Price in Mansfield Park, and,
interestingly enough, *Jane* Bennett in Pride and Prejudice-
-Elinor, Anne, and Fanny are all the heroines of their
novels, but Jane is the second fiddle in P&P to the more
potentially Marianne-ish Elizabeth).
[>
Marianne, Elinor and Elizabeth Bennet - The Golden
Mean -- Rahael, 04:03:20 07/22/02 Mon
Or, "Why Buffy isn't a Stoic" (as Sophist pointed out very
clearly the last time this came up.
It is instructive to note that Jane Austen was an author who
clearly matured, both in writing and in thought over the
years. Each novel is finer, and Sense and Sensibility is
surely her worst novel. (She is a wonderful writer, with a
deepening thougthfulness and subtlety, as her Juvenilia
makes quite clear).
Marianne is a caricature of the 'Romantic', all overblown
feeling, going into raptures at the reading of a poem (quite
disgusted with Edward's passionless reading of poetry). She
indulges every feeling, sorrow, joy, despair, to the point
where she gets sick from unhappiness.
Elinor is rational, sensible, logical. She makes her
decisions from careful thought. Austen's heroines tend to
veer from one of these extremes to another, whether it is
the impressionable and foolish Catherine Morland, or the
patient, stoical Fanny.
But I'd like to look at some other models, because Jane
Austen never caricatures, and always can see the full
complexity and consequences for any kind of behaviour.
Anne Elliot, heroine of her finest novel, Persuasion
patiently endures her trials in life. But we learn that all
this disappointment and unhappiness came about simply
because she was a good girl and listened to the rational
sense of her godmother, rather than follow her heart. At the
end of the novel, she sets off to an unusual, love filled
life, on the ocean seas.
Fanny Price who has to bear the insults of life because she
is poor, patiently waits and waits for the good things of
life. But she has no choice, poor thing! Jane Austen knew
too well the terrible life that awaited women who a) made
the wrong choice of husband b)didn't marry. Fanny has to
negotiate these rocks. She, in the end, chooses love over
social advantage, rejecting the showy Henry Crawford, the
logical choice, for Edmund, the moral one. All along she
defies her family because her heart and head, her emotions
and morals are in perfect alignment - I'd call her the most
complex, developed and 'rational' heroine Jane Austen has
shown us. I love her, but she is without doubt the most
unpopular heroine among readers.
Then we have Emma, who is shown learning to control her
emotions, slowly learning the value of wisdom and compassion
and thoughtfulness over impulsive, emotional decisions.
But finally, we have Miss Elizabeth Bennet, the most likable
of all her heroines. Jane Austen wrote in a letter about
Elizabeth, "I must confess that I think her as delightful a
character as ever appeared in print, and how I shall be able
to tolerate those who do not like her at least, I do not
know".
Stoicism is caricatured in Pride and Prejudice in the shape
of the dreary Mary, who is of course forced to be stoical
because she is going to end up on the shelf (Jane Austen is
always aware of the ironies of life, and the shortcomings of
human beings, especially herself). She spends the novel
imparting advice to her sisters, especially about moral
decision making, and disregarding the false things in
life.
Elizabeth is impulsive, generous and witty. She judges Darcy
without thinking things through logically. She rejects
Collins, though the dutiful thing to do would have been to
marry him. She treks through the muddy fields out of love
for her sister (though I don't see stoicism as seeing that
as a bad passion, necessarily.)I'd like to point out that
her calm, good sister Jane nearly loses the love of her
life, Bingley because Darcy is able to persuade him that
Jane feels nothing for him. As Charlotte shrewdly points
out, she had better give him indication of her passion, even
more than she felt, if she was to catch him.
What does this have to do with Buffy? Because I think she is
more like her namesake, Elizabeth than any other Austen
heroine. Not for Buffy the meek obediance of Fanny, or the
patience of Anne, or the irritating silliness of
Marianne.
She is engaging, witty, lively. She is not a stoic because
she does not control harmful passions - she risks a great
deal for her injudicious love for Angel. She engages in sex
with Spike, even though it is clearly a bad decision by
Stoical thinking. She allows negative emotion to overwhelm
her after Becoming - the correct thing to do would be to
master her passion and stay in Sunnydale. Similarly, the
catatonia in Spiral, again not the Stoical thing to do.
Emotionlessnes is not necssarily Stoical. Stoicism is to
recognise and master emotion through rational and logical
means.
I remember the Buffy of Prophecy girl, I remember someone
who exhibits the full range of human emotions. This is
precisely why her lack of feeling in Season 6 is so marked.
She feels anger, love, sadness, joy, lust. She doesn't slay
calmly and rationally, she does it with a twinkle in her eye
and a quip. She doesn't need to attract attention in the
same way as Willow. She is the centre of the Scooby gang,
the focus of all the attention. She has a mother who has
always loved her, a Watcher watching out for her, a group of
friends who spend all their time helping her. Willow makes
noise because she has grown up neglected, with parents who
clearly don't care about her.
Buffy is always the focus of attention, whether she's in
Sunnydale, in LA or in heaven. She's the Slayer, and of huge
importance. She already has just about as much attention as
she can take.
So I'd say that Buffy is neither unemotional nor lacking
attention. She is so good at emotions, that she can utilise
it to her advantage. Willow on the other hand goes between
the extremes of Elinor and Marianne - either calm, rational
and logical, or wracked by pain, or filled with joy.
[> [>
Re: Marianne, Elinor and Elizabeth Bennet - The Golden
Mean -- Ronia- Agree completely, 06:56:01 07/22/02
Mon
[> [>
Acting stoically is temporary behaviour, not
permanent -- Caesar
Augustus, 06:57:16 07/22/02 Mon
Emotionlessnes is not necssarily Stoical. Stoicism is to
recognise and master emotion through rational and logical
means.
Stoicism is the endurance of pain/hardship without
emotion/complaint (straight from dictionary). Stoicism is
switching off on an emotional level. Emotionlessness is very
much a huge part of stoicism. Stoicism is not about
recognising your emotions and logically overriding them!!
That's called 'being rational'. Stoicism is about
disconnecting from your emotions - the best way I can think
of putting it is 'your brain disconnecting from your
heart'.
The other main thing that bugged me is that there's no such
thing as a stoic person. Some people act stoically in
certain circumstances. A stoic response to death is not
uncommon - it certainly does not mean that people who react
that way have never shown emotion in their life!!! It is a
particular response to extreme emotions and
circumstances. It has nothing to do with usually being
unemotional. Buffy was initially shut down about the Angel
thing too (Innocence), one should remember. Buffy certainly
responded stoically to her mother's death and her whole s6
'feeling dead' response to coming back to life is as clear a
stoic reaction as I could imagine. Refusing to talk to her
friends! Being more concerned with them not worrying at all
about her than her own situation!
One trivial point I feel obliged to mention because at times
I'm just a petty man:
Please don't use capital S. The school of Stoicism (teaching
that virtue comes from knowledge) has very different
connotations from the general word stoicism. Saying someone
is a stoic also emphasises the Stoicism connotation,
which I dislike. All this talk about her being a Stoic is,
in my own (very critical at the moment) opinion, a hint that
the point has very much been missed.
[> [> [>
I was talking about Stoicism with a capital S --
Rahael, 07:09:51 07/22/02 Mon
And I assumed you were too - this being the Philosophy board
and all.
Since John Burwood talked about being rational versus
emotional, and this is very much the dichotomy that he sets
up using Elinor and Marianne. Elinor emphatically does not
disconnect her heart and mind. Her heart and mind are in
perfect harmony.
I have never used stoicism, either on this board or in
ordinary life, to mean anything but Stoicism with a capital
S. Epicureanism, on the other hand, I frequently use in the
non philosophical way, because ordinary use and
philosophical use has diverged widely on that term.
You ask me to not use Stoicism with a capital S. Why? Have I
applied the principles of Stoic philosophy incorrectly? It
is true that it is about 5 years since I last sat in on
philosophy classes. Please correct me if I have got it
wrong.
[> [> [> [>
Re: I was talking about Stoicism with a capital S -
- Vickie, 07:14:37 07/22/02 Mon
From my feeble understanding of porch philosophy, I think
you have it correctly Rah. Doubtless, Cleanthes will chime
in and correct us if not. ;-)
[> [> [> [> [>
Porch philosophy, lol -- Rahael, 07:24:12
07/22/02 Mon
Thanks Vickie!
I would say that Buffy's actions in Season 6 are those of a
depressed person. I always thought that Stoical, as it is in
common parlance has good connotations, arising from the
philosophy itself, which had a whole moral and ethical
outlook on life. In any case, since English is not my first
language, I often learn the use of words in different
contexts - I'm far more likely to know a word in an academic
rather than a colloquial sense since I didn't grow up with
English speakers.
I wasn't responding to CA, as such in my post - I was
responding to John Burwood's post, and the qualities of
Elinor are very much of the idea that the virtuous person is
prepared for the misfortunes of life, and treats them as she
would the fortunes of life, always acting as virtue, rather
than passion dictated.
[> [> [> [>
Definition of Stoicism with a capital S -- Sophist,
12:50:31 07/22/02 Mon
Here's a more complete one:
The Stoics emphasized the role of fate. The goal of each
human being is to understand the divine plan and to act
according to it. This means acting in accord with virtue,
which for the Stoics, is the only good. The Stoics believed
that happiness was achieved by following reason, by freeing
themselves from passions, and by concentrating only on
things they could control.
Doesn't sound like Buffy to me.
[> [> [> [> [>
I didn't realise that Stoicism were fatalistic --
Rahael, 13:58:25 07/22/02 Mon
I had always thought they considered the full range of
possiblities, and were prepared for all of them.
But I bow to superior wisdom!
[> [> [> [> [> [>
LOL -- Sophist, 16:36:14 07/22/02 Mon
In that case, I'm embarrassed to report that the definition
came from the World Book encyclopedia. Quickest source I had
online. And worth every penny I paid for it.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
You're shattering all my illusions! -- Rahael,
00:20:32 07/23/02 Tue
You looked it up? LOL
Okay, I consulted my Penguin dictionary of Philosophy and
nary a mention of fatalistic outlooks on life. Of
course,silence does not mean absence.
Someone needs to arbitrate!
Masqy??
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Cleanthes, call your office! -- d'Herblay,
03:34:00 07/23/02 Tue
[> [> [> [> [> [>
The Stoicists were not fatalistic -- Masq,
11:33:44 07/24/02 Wed
The Stoics were not fatalists. Their views more closely
resemble what is known as "determinism" or "scientific
determinism" (see my webpage
http://www.atpobtvs.com/philos2.html#fw).
The difference between fatalism and determinism is this: the
determinist believes that if event A happens, event B must
also happen. If Angel locks Darla and Drusilla in with the
lawyers (A), the vampires will eat the lawyers (B). B must
follow A, no question
A -> B
Determinists also believe, on the other hand, that if event
A doesn't happen, it's an open call whether event B will
happen:
not A->not B or not A-> B
If Angel doesn't lock the lawyers in with the vampires (not
A), maybe the lawyers escape the vampires (not B), or maybe
the vampires lock themselves in with the lawyers and the
lawyers end up getting eaten (not A->B). Either could
happen.
The fatalist, on the other hand, is the person that says
"The lawyers were fated to get eaten no matter what Angel
did". Angel locks them in (A), the laywers get eaten (B).
Angel walks away leaving the door open (not B), the lawyers
get eaten anyway. There's no escaping their "fate".
A->B or not A->B, no chance of the result not B.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Thanks!! -- Rahael, 14:58:51 07/24/02 Wed
For taking the time to explain. I owe you lots and lots of
paragraphs!
[> [> [> [>
Completely different wavelengths -- Caesar
Augustus, 17:38:41 07/22/02 Mon
Obviously I didn't realise you were talking about proper
Stoicism. That's fine. It's just after all the talk about
Buffy reacting by downplaying her feelings, etc., I thought
we were all talking about stoicism. Stoicism is very
different (even though that's where the word 'stoicism'
derives from) and I would only add to Sophist's very good
definition that the Stoic philosophy believes that the path
to virtue should be understood through knowledge/study/etc.
Buffy's certainly not a Stoic. I don't think anyone was
claiming she was. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
[> [> [> [> [>
Buffy's path to Eudaimonia -- Rahael, 02:39:57
07/23/02 Tue
Yes, different wavelengths, since I only knew one definition
of stoicism! Perhaps I've been misunderstanding it when
people have used it in ordinary conversation/books for
years? Or is it because I rarely read anything written after
the 1950s?
Hmmmm.
Certainly, emotionlessness seems to be the popular
understanding of stoicism, emotionlessness in the face of
misfortune, but to me, it always meant a calm
emotionlessness in the face of fortune itself (which is
capricious and not to be trusted).
Also, perhaps I've a very one sided view of Stoicism, (and
I've approached it in later years in a very sideways
perspective, with the Renaissance interest in Ancient
philosophy – Cicero, Seneca’s importance to the Renaissance
courtier, etc.). So my view has connected it to the long
running debate between public office as being virtuous
versus public office as being corrupting. The idea that the
Ancients could provide a model of living. Rather than
knowledge, I’d say wisdom. The idea of ‘knowing’ and
‘knowledge’ are so complex. Then there’s the whole issue of
false impressions/true impressions.
This kind of connects to the discussion around Arystocrat’s
post. Buffy may still live a virtuous life, and thereby a
happy one, but one which might not involve money or worldly
success. Money is an ‘indifferent’ thing. The path to the
good life is travelled by rational emotion (emotions aren’t
bad, but they should be appropriate). Stoicism, as I
understand it, is not fighting your emotions – but going
with them, because we should desire virtue. Our emotions
should be rational. Rationality and emotion are not
dichotomous (a view which I’m very attracted to). In the
sense that Buffy’s emotions, at moments of crisis at least,
lead her to virtue, she is on the way to eudaimonia. For
example, Cave Buffy, governed by emotion chose to rescue
Parker and Willow. Her other emotional choices weren’t so
virtuous however (though she did exercise a healthy
intellectual curiousity!!). Anyway, Buffy’s happiness should
be independent of the twists and turns of life, independent
of poverty, or riches, fortune or misfortune. Because at the
end of the day, she’s got herself, and her mind, and the
ability to exercise virtuous choices. And she’s pretty
gifted at finding choices out of black and white situations
(pun intended!)
Anyway, all this comes from 2 years of high school
philosophy, and we were taught by one of those wonderful
eccentrics you never forget. I remember a lot of Aristotle
and Wittgenstein and virtually nothing else. All I remember
about Bertrand Russell is something about a chair. He always
insisted on pronouncing Kant a certain way, and he used to
call Roger Scruton ‘Roger Scrotum’. I remember a discussion
where he insisted that the Stoics were not fatalists, though
it would be easy to confuse them as such. But he could be
wrong!! He had a unique perspective on the world.
(He was also the person who I discussed poetry with. We
spent lunch hours discussing literature and poetry – I’d
bring Herbert, he introduced me to Graves. I owe him more
than this – he taught me to always think clearly, and
rationally, and that no problem was to big not to spot the
virtuous course of action).
[> [> [>
Small rider -- Caesar
Augustus, 07:10:49 07/22/02 Mon
I said "The other main thing that bugged me is that there's
no such thing as a stoic person."
Actually there is such a thing as a stoic person, but I
don't think anyone is suggesting that Buffy is a stoic
person in the stolid sense that some rare people in this
world are. The usual meaning of the word stoic refers to how
people respond to grief situations ...
Just thought I'd add that before I get shouted down for one
stray comment rather than people actually analysing the
points I made.
[> [>
Emotional withdrawal -- ponygirl, 10:46:18
07/22/02 Mon
"Buffy is always the focus of attention, whether she's in
Sunnydale, in LA or in heaven. She's the Slayer, and of huge
importance. She already has just about as much attention as
she can take."
It's interesting that Buffy's response in times of extreme
emotional stress is to withdraw, definitely emotionally,
sometimes physically. We see this in WSWB, when Buffy tried
to distance herself from family and friends, we see it in
Becoming when she left for LA. As mentioned that response
is very evident in Forever and most dramatically in Weight
of the World where Buffy actually went catatonic in order to
avoid dealing with emotions of guilt and helplessness. It's
almost as though with her huge responsibilities, that as you
say make her actions the constant centre of attention, she
can't bear for a scrutiny of her inner emotions, seemingly
even by herself. It has been an interesting process
watching an understandable defence mechanism turn into a
fullblown disorder. For me what made Buffy's struggles in
s6 so poignant is that unlike her earlier withdrawals her
depression was something she was aware of and actively
trying to break out of.
Love the Jane Austen comparison Rahael and John! I'll have
to forward them to my friend, she's a new Buffy convert but
a huge Austen fan.
[> [> [>
Re: Emotional withdrawal -- Vickie, 11:23:17
07/22/02 Mon
I *think* the first time Buffy withdraws this way is the
school hallway scene in Innocence.
Angelus threatens her friends, threatens her, then kisses
her. He throws her up against the wall and leaves. Buffy
slides down the wall and sits on the floor, staring into
space as her friends come up to her. She ignores them (and
we go to station break).
"Uh, oh self," I said to myself, "this girl is close to the
end of her ability to cope." And she was.
I wouldn't say Buffy does this a lot, but it is her ultimate
reaction to stress.
[> [> [> [>
Catatonia -- auroramama, 21:36:40 07/23/02
Tue
Oh, Vickie, I like that. She doesn't do it a lot, she's very
hard to break -- but when she breaks, that's the fault line:
withdrawal, with the endpoint being permanent catatonia, as
in NA.
[> [> [> [>
Re: Emotional withdrawal -- hathir_child,
22:48:31 07/23/02 Tue
She does this earlier too. In WSWB, Hank tells Joyce about
how Buffy was during the summer with him - friendly, but
distant, not quite there. There are earlier, but more
subtle examples.
[> [>
Re: Marianne, Elinor and Elizabeth Bennet - The Golden
Mean -- John Burwood, 12:36:40 07/22/02 Mon
Love your post, Rahael - great analysis of Jane Austen
heroines - you in Jane Austen Society, too? Got to say
Fanny Price is my persoanl favourite too - & first love.
When I was 14 in an all-boys school & got asked to write an
essay on a book of my choice I chose Mansfield Park -
perhaps luckily was not asked to deliver it to my class like
Willow in Restless.
But I do agree totally on your comparison of Buffy &
Elizabeth Bennet - to me Buffy is the most delightful
character ever on the screen.
Hence my interest to rationalise why some people actively
dislike her, & use of the classic Elinor/Marianne contrast.
Of course, JA, like JW, always writes her characters much
more complex and subtle but it is there & it has mythic
significance to me.
I have always been fascinated by the way different observers
can interpret the identical people/actions/events in totally
opposite ways.
Too often in the realverse - especially in politics - people
can refuse to believe the opposite interpretations can be
both sincere & sensible - thank God the posters don't fall
into that too easy trap.
[> [> [>
A passionate Austenite (and she has kick ass table
manners to boot!) -- Rahael, 14:27:37 07/22/02
Mon
She's probably the writer I have most read and reread,
throughout my childhood, through to now. I should join the
Austen society, shouldn't I? lol
I love Mansfield Park. I think it is the sharpest political
critique Jane Austen has ever written. The beautiful,
harmonious Mansfield Park, mismanaged in the hands of the
careless Sir Bertram. The lure of showy London, with its
total misunderstanding of the ways and traditions of the
countryside. The play within the novel that is enacted, that
becomes a focus for unbalanced emotion and the breeding
ground for immorality. And we have two symbols of hope,
Fanny and Edmund, loving, moral, clear sighted.
The Court versus Country debate translated into a new
century.
Most of all, I simply love her prose. I find it the most
elegant, well balanced beautifully written English I've ever
encountered. The sentence construction in Mansfield Park is
something I swoon over!!!
Joss when asked who he'd have for dinner, said Jane Austen,
because she was a brilliant novelist, and she'd have kick
ass table manners!
[> [> [> [>
Well...Joss to Jane -- fresne, 14:50:27 07/22/02
Mon
Well, (and let’s see if I can make this work), since I have
this on hand.
Perhaps, there's a good reason for the Joss to Jane
connection.
fresne-voting for Buffy as Mr. Darcy, because it's wrong and
I don't want to be right.
[> [> [> [> [>
LOL!!! (and am now v. intrigued by Buffy as Darcy
hmmmmm) -- Rahael, 14:59:13 07/22/02 Mon
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Well...Joss to Jane -- shadowkat, 09:57:11
07/23/02 Tue
Yes as a fervent reader and lover of Austen, I thought a
while ago that Buffy made a better Darcy than Elisbeth.
I remember reading someone's analysis and thinking just
this. Buffy like Darcy is fairly contained. Somewhat
judgemental. And loves people against her will.
Keeps her emotions to herself. And always does what is best
for everyone concerned in the end. (Well not always but most
of the time.) Hmmm wonder how much of Austen Whedon
read? Anyone have a biography of Whedon available?
[> [> [> [>
Re: A passionate Austenite (and she has kick ass table
manners to boot!) -- Caroline, 15:00:29 07/22/02
Mon
What a fabulous analogy! Now I have these visuals, Buffy as
Elizabeth (loved by Darcy/Spike but won't give them the time
of day), Spike as Darcy (whom Buffy/Elizabeth both seriously
prejudge), Angel as Wickham (deserted the heroine), Tara as
Jane (loyal sister/friend), Willow at end of season 6 as
Lydia (betraying family/friends)...
No no no have to stop - too much work to do.
It's always the same old story.
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: A passionate Austenite (and she has kick ass table
manners to boot!) -- fresne, 15:17:27 07/22/02
Mon
That works. Although, Darcy/Wickham, hmmm...
However, (sometimes I feel like I talk about it waaaay too
much, so I apologize if I'm taking up bandwidth)
what I meant was Joss Whedon's Pride and Prejudice.
http://lifeamgood.com/01aprbuffy.html
About a year ago my housemate and I took P&P (yes, the
entire book - and with pictures), reversed the genders and
replaced everyone with Buffy characters.
Character switches were chosen based on rightness (it worked
in some strange way. The Buffy/Spike, Darcy/Liz switch works
horrifyingly well.) and yet was very, very wrong.
To wit, Angel was Lydia. Mrs. Bennett - The Mayor, etc.
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: A passionate Austenite (and she has kick ass table
manners to boot!) -- Malandanza, 19:53:31 07/22/02
Mon
"Now I have these visuals, Buffy as Elizabeth (loved by
Darcy/Spike but won't give them the time of day), Spike as
Darcy (whom Buffy/Elizabeth both seriously prejudge), Angel
as Wickham (deserted the heroine), Tara as Jane (loyal
sister/friend), Willow at end of season 6 as Lydia
(betraying family/friends)..."
I agree with Tara as Jane Bennet, but Spike as Mr. Darcy? I
really can't see him as Wickham, either, even if we allow
Harmony to be Lydia (which seems a good match to me).
For Spike, I'd pick Henry Crawford -- since he destroyed
months of work ingratiating himself with the heroine, only
to throw it all away in a moment of ill-advised passion with
Maria Rushworth/Anya. Although Henry Crawford's manners
towards his beloved are much more becoming than are
Spike's.
At first, I thought Willow might fit as Emma, since Emma
ought to be insufferable, but isn't. And Emma would have
been insufferable had it not been for the quiet guidance of
Mr. Knightley (which, I suppose, would make Tara Mr.
Knightley). But I can't really see Willow as a heroine of a
novel, even a flawed one like Emma. She doesn't have enough
subtlety to be Lady Susan -- maybe Bingley's sister?
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Surely a little harsh, lol -- Rahael, 07:21:12
07/23/02 Tue
Since she's neither stupid, vulgar or snobbish?
As far as I know, the Bingley sisters didn't have any saving
graces. (they may have had stylish clothes however.
Hmmmm).
I have another comparison: Cordy = Emma
Spoilt, rich, witty. Taught by life and Mr Knightley that
she could be more than this.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
It depends on your view of Caroline Bingley --
Malandanza, 09:03:57 07/23/02 Tue
"Since she's neither stupid, vulgar or snobbish?
As far as I know, the Bingley sisters didn't have any saving
graces. (they may have had stylish clothes however.
Hmmmm)."
Had I seen the Colin Firth adaptation of P&P before reading
the book, I would likely agree with you about Caroline
Bingley. However, I don't think that she's quite so bad as
you make her out to be (or that Willow is quite so free from
these same faults as you would like her to be). The
snobbishness is partly a product of the times -- things we
consider to be snobbery were not considered so -- consider
that even Elizabeth Bennet would be a snob by our
standards:
"They [the Bingley women] were of a respectable family in
the north of England; a circumstance more deeply impressed
on their memories than that their brother's fortune and
their own had been acquired by trade."
Their father worked for a living! How common! A similar
observation is made by Emma regarding Mrs. Elton -- although
she also had the problem of having an Uncle who still worked
as a lawyer (never mind that Mr. John Knightley was also a
lawyer...)
Elizabeth also went through a period where she was ashamed
of her mother and younger sisters (Mary included, but
especially Lydia) which reminded me of Great
Expectations when Pip says that it's a terrible thing to
be ashamed of your relations.
Elizabeth's other observations on the Bingley girls have
some positive aspects, even though she was inclined to
dislike them:
"They were in fact very fine ladies; not deficient in good
humor when they were pleased, nor in the power of being
agreeable when they chose it, but proud and conceited. They
were rather handsome, had been educated in one of the first
private seminaries in town..."
So, not vulgar or stupid either. And they couldn't have
been so very bad -- Mr. Darcy only danced twice at that
first ball, with Mrs. Hurst and Caroline Bingley and "spent
the rest of the evening in walking about the room, speaking
occasionally to one of his own party." Since Mr. Bingley
danced every dance, it suggests that Mr. Darcy conversed
sometimes with Caroline or Mrs. Hurst -- it's hard to
imagine Mr. Hurst having anything to say. He is frequently
in Miss Bingley's company (no doubt, partly by Miss
Bingley's design -- but I feel confident that a forthright
person like Mr. Darcy could have easily escaped her presence
-- or, at least, avoided going on intimate walks with her --
had he chosen to do so). Plus Caroline Bingley was bright
enough to join Mr. Darcy in trying to prevent the
Jane/Bingley romance for her own reasons (if Mr. Bingley is
near Jane, Mr. Darcy will be near Elizabeth).
So for the pride and the feelings of being unnoticed because
of Buffy, I'd say Willow is a pretty good match for Miss
Bingley.
But Cordy and Emma? Emma knows what tact is.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: It depends on your view of Caroline Bingley --
Rahael, 09:33:30 07/23/02 Tue
Yes you're right in one way, the recent version does indeed
stick in my mind.
But I always thought that the 'fine' ladies were a satirical
portrait (along with Darcy's aunt and 'betrothed') about
how the upper classes could be just as vulgar (in their
behaviour) as Elizabeth's mother. They after all do not
realise that Georgiana was responsible for the same
behaviour they mock in Lydia. They cannot recognise true
breeding, mistaking wealth and outward appearance as
substitutes.
Jane Austen is snobbish. She thinks the working classes can
never aspire to truly refined behaviour (they may aspire to
be good people, however, and worthy of respect). She
considers a good upbringing and an education as essential in
creating true nobility. But I don't think she ever mistakes
wealth and birth as automatic qualifiers for good breeding.
Vulgarity transcends class. Elizabeth finally discriminates
between the finer man. She also recognises Darcy is equally
unfortunate in his relatives as she is in hers. Darcy
himself is forced to confront this.
As for Emma being tactful, remember the picnic? where she
was so rude to Jane Fairfax's aunt? If that isn't untactful,
I don't know what is!
The Bingley sisters are made fine by their clothes and their
money but their true image is shoddy. I'd still say that
Willow is not vulgar, nor stupid, nor snobbish. Immature,
yes. Self centred yes. But also sweet, helpful and
constantly wanting to put herself out to help others. The
Bingleys don't even understand why Elizabeth would be so
concerned about her sister.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
I (politely) disagree -- Arethusa, 09:49:56
07/23/02 Tue
Lizzie was ashamed of her relations because their actions
were shameful-her mother's stupidity, and loud and naked
ambition for her daughters, Lydia and Kitty's vulgar
behavior and chasing after soldiers, even her father's
refusal to do his duty and correct the behavior of his wife
and children. Lizzie was proud of her lawyer uncle and his
wife, her aunt, because the were well-bred, sensible,
intelligent people.
Caroline Bingley actively discouraged her brother from
pursuing Jane, whom Caroline had taken up as a friend,
because she wanted Bingley to marry Darcy's sister,
tightening the binds between the families. (Of course, she
wanted Darcy for herself.) Lizzie said a gentleman's
daughter was good enough for a gentleman, and Jane was good
enough for anyone. A wealthy young woman's private seminary
was not an intellectual stronghold. She could very easily
be stupid, and it was stupid to denegrate Lizzie in front of
Darcy, when he admired her. Would Willow double-cross a
friend for personal gain, or denegrate those who were
socially beneath her?
Austen made great distinctions between those who acted well-
bred, and those who were. Look at the Bertrams-the father
finally learned in the end that a fine appearance doesn't
compensate for a vulgar heart. Mrs Elton was common to the
core-ambitious, grasping, overly familiar, presumptuous.
Emma was often snobbish, but there was also a huge
difference at the time between a son of the town's oldest
landowner being a lawyer, and a man of no family dignity
being a lawyer.
I think Cordy is quite similiar to Emma. Both were rich,
beautiful, popular, and self-satisfied, but basically good.
Both became more empathetic as they grew older, and both
thought they knew everyone's romantic wishes. Compare
Cordy's advice to Fred to Emma's advice to Miss Smith-both
read the romantic situations totally wrong. Emma could be
rude too-remember what she said to Miss Bates at the
picnic.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: I (politely) disagree -- Malandanza,
23:17:59 07/23/02 Tue
Well, Miss Bingley is certainly far from perfect, and I
don't care to defend her any further, having gone beyond any
reasonable expectation. I only meant that she is not quite
so bad. However, you mention Willow:
"Would Willow double-cross a friend for personal gain, or
denigrate those who were socially beneath her? "
To which I would reply yes, and yes. In All the Way
and Tabula Rasa she betrays Tara. In Doublemeat
Palace she says this of her social inferiors:
WILLOW: You shoulda seen their headquarters, it was
like, the nerd natural habitat.
Miss Bingley mocked Elizabeth Bennet for having two lawyers
in her family, forgetting that she had lawyers in hers as
well -- here, Willow mocks the nerds, conveniently
forgetting her own past.
"Emma could be rude too-remember what she said to Miss
Bates at the picnic."
I also remember how mortified Emma was by her own behavior
after Mr. Knightley spoke to her about it. I can't imagine
Cordy ever apologizing or feeling remorse after putting
someone down. On the other hand, I can't imagine Cordelia
ever doing something as deliberately cruel and calculated as
Emma's deliberate snubbing of the Martins (in chapter
23)
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
(politely) disagreeing again -- Rahael, 01:18:50
07/24/02 Wed
Well, this is purely a matter of perspective, but in my view
Willow's casual aside about the nerds (who are after all,
self styled nerds) is not layered with the implications that
Caroline Bingley's comment about Elizabeth was. Elizabeth
could have been a prospective wife - the implication of her
comment was that Elizabeth was fundamentally unfit to be any
gentleman's wife, and the same for Jane. It's money plus
class that's crucial, as Jane Austen points out - money
conceals the greatest of faults, including lawyers and
uncles in Cheapside aplenty. And it is money and marriage
that the books very first sentence concerns itself with.
Therefore, that comment goes to the heart of power, class
money, and has more drastic implications for the Bennetts
than any sneer that Willow made.
And it's not so much from the tv adaptation that I dislike
Miss Bingley (I have far too much affection for Anna
Chancellor). Its the sly cruelty she exhibits. Not as openly
vulgar as Mrs Bennett or Mrs Elton (which is the nickname I
have for a universally loathed member of staff), but in her
subtle little digs to Elizabeth in front of Darcy and
Bingley. It's a kind of bullying I recognise all too well,
the cruelty masked with a slight smile.
As for Cordy not being as cruel as Emma's deliberate
campaign against Martin ever marrying Harriet, I think I'm
remembering a very different Cordy from the first season
than you. "Obsession of dork" "No wonder you're such a boy
magnet". I'd rather someone snubbed me than engage in such
serial cruelty on a daily basis. Willow and Xander loathed
Cordy for a reason.
Emma was mortified precisely because it was tactlessness
rather than cruelty at the picnic, and about 50% of her
remorse came from the fact that Knightly was so caustic
toward her. Knightley, disapproving of her! How could she
bear this? I'm pretty sure Cordy feels remorse about her
earlier cruelty "if I felt less, I could speak more" - to
paraphrase Knightley himself.
(Okay, I really enjoy nitpicking Jane Austen much much more
than nitpicking BtVS!)
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
[>
Re: (politely) disagreeing again -- Arethusa,
05:38:48 07/24/02 Wed
From Rm w/a View
Angel goes to stand beside Cordy: “You know, this really is
just a place to live.”
Cordy: “No, It’s more. It’s beautiful, - and if it goes
away it’s like..”
Angel: “Like what?”
Cordy quietly: “Like I’m still getting punished.”
Angel: “Punished. (Cordy nods) For what?”
Cordy: “I don’t know. For what I was? For everything I
said in High School just because I could get away with it?
- And then it all ended, and I had to pay. - Oh, but this
apartment – I could be me again. Punishment over – welcome
back to your life! Like, like I couldn’t be that awful if I
get to have a place like that?
From Waiting in the Wings
"I was the ditziest bitch in Sunnydale...."
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
[>
Re: (politely) disagreeing again -- Malandanza,
09:08:27 07/24/02 Wed
"Well, this is purely a matter of perspective, but in my
view Willow's casual aside about the nerds (who are after
all, self styled nerds) is not layered with the implications
that Caroline Bingley's comment about Elizabeth was...but in
her subtle little digs to Elizabeth in front of Darcy and
Bingley. It's a kind of bullying I recognise all too well,
the cruelty masked with a slight smile."
I doubt Warren Jonathan and Andrew would have considered
being called nerds a compliment any more than Willow
considered being called "Captain of the Nerd Squad" a
compliment. All three of the boys were trying rather
desperately to be far cooler than they had been in high
school. As someone who resented the charge of being a nerd,
Willow ought not to have made such a remark. But if you
want casually cruel asides, look at the Willow/Anya scenes,
where Willow, with her superior wit, insults Anya in front
of her friends (especially Xander) -- and not just in
Triangle. While more common in Seasons Four and
Five, even in Season Six Willow takes time out from
wallowing in self-pity to be cruel to Anya.
ANYA: Did I look like that? I hope I didn't look like
that.
WILLOW: No, I'm sure you looked really glamorous cutting up
your face.
After Life
(regarding Anya's suggestion to Buffy that she charge for
slaying -- although this remark was after Anya left)
WILLOW: You're throwing away a gold mine.
Flooded
Or this scene, where she adds a little insecurity to
Xander's pre-wedding jitters:
XANDER: (to Willow) Welcome to today's episode of "Go Money
Go." I hear it every day.
WILLOW: Right. For the rest of your life.
Doublemeat Palace
So I think Willow has made plenty of remarks that are more
cruel than Miss Bingley's comments about Elizabeth Bennet's
"fine eyes." And for what reason? Willow doesn't even want
Xander. If you're looking for "cruelty masked with a slight
smile," Willow's your girl.
"As for Cordy not being as cruel as Emma's deliberate
campaign against Martin ever marrying Harriet, I think I'm
remembering a very different Cordy from the first season
than you. "Obsession of dork" "No wonder you're such a boy
magnet." I'd rather someone snubbed me than engage in such
serial cruelty on a daily basis. Willow and Xander loathed
Cordy for a reason."
I was thinking less of the sabotaging of the marriage
proposal and more of the chapter 22-23 visit to the Martin
farm, where Emma sets out to deliberately affront the entire
family. Emma's intent was worse -- Cordelia never bothered
to think that Willow or Xander had feelings. Keep in mind
that Xander and Willow said pretty bad things about Cordelia
as well ("1-800-I'm-Dating-A-Skanky-Ho").
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
[> [>
Impasse! I agree to differ! -- Rahael, 09:52:19
07/24/02 Wed
[> [>
Lizzie Bennett and Buffy -- celticross, 23:12:04
07/22/02 Mon
Hmmmmm....interesting read, Rah. Elizabeth Bennett and I go
way back (ok, back to my sophomore year in high school, but
that's beginning to have been a while) and I can honestly
say I've never made a connection between her and Buffy
Summers. However, I can see a shift between Seasons 1-4
Buffy, with her Lizzie-esque twinkle, and the Buffy of the
past two seasons. Buffy has had no end of troubles (I'll
spare everyone the now familiar litany) and they have
overwhelmed her. In this, she is most un-Lizzie like, but
she is finding herself again, and this is the part of
growing up that's just as important as learning new things
about oneself; holding on to what we know about ourselves
already. Elizabeth Bennett has one of the strongest senses
of self I've seen in any novel I've ever read, and as a
reader, I find that even more appealing than her wonderful
wit. It is knowing herself that helps her rise above her
mistakes (plus a few well written letters :). As for Buffy,
maybe now she can use the lessons of her long dark season
and a half of the soul and rediscover her sorely missed
sparkle.
(And as for Miss Austen, I have promised myself I will re-
read Persuasion before grad school starts in another
month...better get to it :) Ah...Captain Wentworth...)
[> [> [>
Captain Wentworth -- Rahael, 07:00:38 07/23/02
Tue
may be my favourite Austen hero.
As for Lizzy, isn't she ever in mind of the knowledge that
she is able to be independent and strong minded because of
circumstance? and that circumstances might change for her.
The whole situation underlying the plot of P&P is the
financial and marital vulnerability of the women.
How long will Charlotte remain intelligent, wise and happy
having to endure married life with Mr Collins? How wretched
will Lydia's life become? All her novels tell us that
people's characters are molded by circumstance. Kitty's
character takes a turn for the better because she is taken
in hand by her older sisters. Fanny is still better brought
up than the rest of her siblings because she was lucky
enough to be adopted by the Betram family, shallow, stupid
and selfish as most of them were.
How lively might Lizzy Bennett remain, if subjected to
misfortune after misfortune?
[> [> [> [>
Re: Captain Wentworth -- Arethusa, 08:53:33
07/23/02 Tue
"The whole situation underlying the plot of P&P is the
financial and marital vulnerability of the women."
I was also stuck by what a big difference the choice of a
wife made for the men in Austen's works. Look at Marianne
and Elinor's brother-a weak man who might have been decent
if he married better. The beginning of Sense and
Sensibility has one of the most merciless depictions of
greed and self-delusion I've ever seen in print.
I felt sorry for Charlotte, but she knew exactly what she
was doing. Independent misery is better than dependent
misery, and she'll have a beautiful home, her duties,
children and poultry to keep her busy. No doubt she'll
continue to encourage her husband's gardening interests, as
often as possible.
[> [> [> [> [>
Re: Captain Wentworth -- celticross, 11:18:44
07/23/02 Tue
Well, we know Austen wrote from the examples she saw in her
circle of family and friends. It's striking to discover how
she interacted with her brothers' wives. And she was all
too aware of the role circumstance played in life. Her
eldest brother lived the life of a country gentleman,
married to the daughter of a baronet, because he had been
adopted by a gentleman as his heir. He had a lifestyle far
out of the reach of his siblings, though he was very good to
them, particularly his sisters. *veering back into Buffy
territory* I think Austen could have apperciated Buffy's
straits, given her taste for irony and her eye for
circumstance. Buffy is, in many ways, a Austenesque
heroine. She's doing what she can in the situation she's
found herself in, though her life is a bit more like the
"horrid novels" that Catherine Morland was so fond of, and
not so much like one of Austen's own books.
As for Charlotte Collins, I'm with Arethusa. Look at her
family. They're not the brightest bunch. She knows how to
deal with stupid people. :)
[> [> [> [> [>
Charlotte Collins & the high-jump=bar principle --
John Burwood, 13:14:23 07/23/02 Tue
Changing the subject somewhat (but if I can't hi-jack my own
damn thread whose damn thread can I hijack?) I have always
seen the Collins' marriage as a classic lesson for the
problems of modern marriage. So often when high divorce
rates are reported you get media pundits pontificating on
what is wrong with marriage today when the real problem is
what is right.
It is the high-jump-bar principle - the higher you raise it,
the fewer can jump it. The more is expected of a marriage,
or a relationship, or a career, or a government, the more
likely the disillusionment when it is not achieved.
Charlotte set her bar so low there is no chance of her ever
seeing her marriage as a failure. Thank God women today
don't get forced to 'settle' as Charlotte did - they can set
the bar so much higher, but the price is amuch greater
failure rate.
Reminds me of Xander's comment of how much pressure life on
the hellmouth puts on relationships - and life as a Slayer
on the hellmouth practically shoves the bar above head
height for any relationship. Buffy would have to find
someone not only to share cooking, paying bills, taxes,
love, remembering to take out the garbage, parent teacher
meetings etc, but also patrolling & fighting demons.
What odds against would that be?
[>
Heads I win, tails you lose -- Sophist, 09:10:28
07/22/02 Mon
Remember Passion? When Buffy & Willow hear about Jenny's
death? I remember some people finding it odd that Joyce went
to comfort Willow instead of her own daughter, but actually
it was natural - because Buffy was sinking in silent shock,
but Willow was crying out loud - making the noise so she got
the attention.
Remember Tabula Rasa, when the SG talked about helping Buffy
deal, & Willow's spell kicked in to stop her. From that
point on, the SG seemed to forget about Buffy's distress as
Willow's break with Tara & magic problems took everyone's
attention.
Guess which was making the noise again?
Is this the same Willow who is constantly said to be
repressing her true feelings, only to let them out at last
in TTG/Grave?
Could we label these Willow One and Willow Two? That way,
the Cat in the Hat can keep track of them.
[> [>
Re: Heads I win, tails you lose -- Rahael,
10:01:51 07/22/02 Mon
Requoting myself:
"So I'd say that Buffy is neither unemotional nor lacking
attention. She is so good at emotions, that she can utilise
it to her advantage. Willow on the other hand goes between
the extremes of Elinor and Marianne - either calm, rational
and logical, or wracked by pain, or filled with joy."
Actually I agree with you re Jenny's death. I thought it
natural that Willow be more upset - Buffy after all, would
have terribly mixed feelings. She hadn't fully resolved her
coldness to Miss Calendar, while Willow clearly looked up to
her, and helped take over her classes and so on. Willow had
more of a relationship with Jenny than Buffy did.
I think what I argued re Willow was that she does not cope
well with feelings, and would rather try and get rid of
them. I mean, she wasn't exactly repressing feelings when Oz
left. She couldnt' bear them, couldn't deal and tried to
make it go poof. Buffy lost Angel and had to run away from
the world. Willow lost Tara, and tried to make the world go
away.
[> [> [>
<Smiling> -- Sophist, 10:47:05 07/22/02
Mon
I wasn't responding to you. Your post on Buffy is one I
agree with (as you knew). In fact, I wasn't necessarily
responding to anyone in this thread. Just making the point
that criticism of Willow comes from 2 directions: that she
displays too much emotion, and that she represses too much.
Along with great drama, each BtVS viewer gets his/her own
alternate reality version of Willow.
My own personal Hell contains only Xander. :)
The Demonic Sea Cucumber! or The Identiy of the
Hellmouth Spawn! -- Majin Gojira, 09:05:49 07/21/02
Sun
Random thing - slight revelation on the Hellmouth Spawn -
what the hell is it?! what is it shaped like and what is
it's true fave?
I beileve I have the answer! It's a Giant Sea Cucumber!
All the Tenticals and 'heads' are the mouth parts of a Giant
Worm-like organism. Since it has no limbs and is ravenously
hungry, when the hellmouth is opened, it streaches out it's
mouth parts to try and snag a meal.
Retracting the mouth parts when it is further out, it
reveales it's real face.
Nasty! :D
[>
Hmmm . . . I'm no marine biologist -- d'Herblay,
17:58:17 07/21/02 Sun
However, I have seen a fair number of sea cucumbers while
diving, and while I may have only successfully avoided the
really dangerous ones, the ones I've seen are sessile and
are about as ravenous as the tubes of chocolate chip cookie
dough they resemble.
[> [>
Re: Hmmm . . . I'm no marine biologist -- Majin
Gojira, 18:03:15 07/21/02 Sun
Yeah! A fellow Diver! I Smile.
Yes, Sea cucumbers are pretty much docile lumps (Like the
Donkey Dung some resemble...wait...there is a Donkey Dung
Sea Cucumber!!)
Anyway, this is a demonic predatory sea cucumber, not the
benign filter-feeders we're used to. It's the only thing I
could think of Biologically to figure out the rest of the
body and it's true face.
Hell, we may see the rest of it some day, and I'll be proven
completely wrong!!!
[> [> [>
Ok, I'm laughing like a treeful of monkeys on nitrous
oxide for some reason -- d'Herblay, 20:24:03 07/21/02
Sun
[> [> [>
could this have anything to do w/a certain menu
item... -- anom, 23:25:10 07/21/02 Sun
...I saw a few years ago in a Japanese restaurant? For some
reason I still remember it was No. 94: Mental Cucumber. If a
cucumber can be mental, why can't a sea cucumber be
demonic?
Then again, maybe it has more to do w/killer tomatoes?
[>
Evil Pickles;) -- Drizzt, 18:10:05 07/21/02
Sun
LOL on your post:)
In the vein of evil pickles...
On another website is a woman who calls herself
DeathPickle;)
There is a guy there who calls himself Squirle-(Something; I
forgot the second part)
So these two people regularly get into freindly discussions
on how squirles are going to take over the world & of course
the reply is evil pickles are going to take over the world.
It is much funnier if you read their posts vs my
description.
Remember Atari?
My fav game on Atari was Space Doungene.
My second favorite game on Atari was this game where food
was flying at you...FAST. If you ate normal food you got
points & extra lives, but if you ate a pickle you DIED! So
the object of the game was to avoid the poisonas
pickles;)
Foreshadowing (major Angel S3 spoilers) --
sunshine, 12:24:24 07/21/02 Sun
I recently watched the Angel episode "Darla" again. In it,
there's a crucial scene where Darla tries to get Angel to
feed on a baby to prove he's serious about coming back to
her. Post-curse Angel can't bring himself to do it, and
Darla orders him away in disgust. With the benefit of
hindsight, this scene is an important piece of foreshadowing
for Angel S3. It certainly has a lot more emotional impact,
knowing what happens in S3 (esp. Darla's self sacrifice to
save her baby).
This happens a lot with B/A - you're rewatching an old
episode, and something takes on fresh significance in the
light of things to come. An extreme example is Buffy's quip
in "The Freshman" about her mum's imagined reaction to the
text book bill Buffy's running up - "hope it's a funny
aneurism! (!)
Anyway, I have a couple of questions about
foreshadowing:
1. What's your favourite example of foreshadowing?
2. Why do B/A use foreshadowing so heavily?
Regarding question 2, it may be useful to compare
foreshadowing to the way that later episodes of Buffy
heavily reference previous apisodes. One good reason for
doing this is that it adds to the illusion that the
Buffyverse is real - the characters remember things that
happened years ago, and occasionally refer to them in
conversation knowing that other characters will also
remember... so those things must really have happened
right?
I'm wondering if there's a similar reason for the heavy use
of foreshadowing. Something to do with evoking a sense of
fate, perhaps? When it's obvious that something is being
foreshadowed ("counting down from 7-3-0") this creates
suspense in the mind of the viewer, but I'm more interested
in those cases where the foreshadowing only becomes clear
after a second, later, viewing.
[>
Re: Foreshadowing (major Angel S3 spoilers) --
AngelVSAngelus, 14:34:38 07/21/02 Sun
You actually totally listed my own personal fav
foreshadowing example, simply for its creepiness. How would
you like to have quipped about the EXACT manner in which
your mother actually dies? *shivers*
I almost wanted Buffy to blame herself for that reason
when I was watching The Body. Not because its really her
fault, just, that'd be a natural reaction. "I was joking
about this a year ago..."
[>
Re: Foreshadowing (major Angel S3 spoilers) --
luvthistle1, 14:53:23 07/21/02 Sun
My favorite episode of foreshadowing are "Restless" (which
have been already been talk about) and
Tabula Rasa. In "Tabula Rasa" Dawn and Buffy are the only
one without names, or know who they are. Next season they
will explore the origin of the slayer and the key. Anya and
Xander did not interact with each other, which foreshadow
their break up in hell's bell. Spike thinking he was Randy
Giles-forshadow spike getting a soul at the end of season 6
. Giles and Anya thinking they were married, might be
foreshadowing them getting becoming closer next season
(Giles and Anya for season 7, maybe?) Spike waking up behind
the counter of the Magic Shop and thinking he is Giles son,
could be foreshadowing Spike taking on the role of a watcher
for Dawn perhaps. Dawn picking up the stake at the end of
the episode could be foreshadowing her becoming the next
slayer. There are a lot more episode like them, that
forshadows whats to come, or have not yet came into
play.
[>
Re: Foreshadowing (major Angel S3 spoilers) --
Alvin, 18:01:43 07/21/02 Sun
I was surprised how much foreshadowing was in Dad when I saw
it as a repeat. For instance, at the end Wes moves closer
to the baby and suggests he should be named Wesley, but
every person in the group says (emphatically) NO causing Wes
to back away from the group. Also, baby Conner rejecting
all the faces Angel makes until Angel vamps out and the baby
is happy with that as Angel's real face. There was also one
that maybe for next season: One of the lawyers says "Before
we know it, that baby will be all grown up and hunting us
down one by one."
[>
Foreshadowing, esp. in Birthday (Angel S3 spoilers)
-- oceloty, 22:56:08 07/21/02 Sun
Last questions first. First questions last. :)
sunshine wrote:
Why do B/A use foreshadowing so heavily?
My take: the more fantastic the premise, the more events
have to be grounded in a consistent internal reality. Both
programs ask the viewers to believe some pretty bizarre
stuff. To make that believable, they have to make it seem
like a logical progression, so they introduce hints and
snippets beforehand, so that when the big surprises come,
the viewer (hopefully) looks back and sees not only the last
big leaps, but the previously unnoticed smaller steps that
built the foundation.
I think both shows have increased the amount of
foreshadowing compared to earlier seasons, maybe because of
the increasing reliance on long-term plot arcs. The bits
help tie individual episodes (especially standalones) into
the long-term events while also providing the emotional
groundwork for later developments.
sunshine also wrote:
What's your favourite example of foreshadowing?
This isn't exactly an answer, but I just saw the repeat of
the Angel ep Birthday and was struck by the amount of visual
foreshadowing for the rest of Angel season 3:
1. Cordelia and Fred cleaning the floor of the hotel lobby
(like they will in The Price, also for a mess created by
Angel).
2. When Angel goes to talk to the powers, it's in a big dark
medieval-ish room lit by torches (which reminds me of
Sahjhan's space, especially from Forgiving). And of course
Angel's reaction to Cordy's coma is a less desperate version
of his actions in Forgiving (and was itself set up by That
Vision Thing). Also, Angel being unable to receive an
important message from Cordelia is exactly what happens at
the end of Tomorrow.
3. In that room, the voices say of Angel: "Does it know
suffering?" All right, this isn't visual
foreshadowing, but boy, is that an understatement of what's
to come for him.
4. Scruffy, unshaven Wesley of Cordelia's alterverse looks
remarkably like scruffy, unshaven Wesley of the end of the
season, except for the big throat scar replacing the lack of
an arm. (I guess the look won't count as a coincidence since
they're played by the same actor but it's a nice hint of
Wesley's coming despair.) Especially the scene where he
takes Cordelia and Gunn into his apartment -- the way it's
framed and lit looked a lot like the shot in which Wes walks
through the door in Double or Nothing).
5. At the house in Reseda (171 Oak), the red pentagram o'
evil-summoning, complete with black candles, was like the
one in Forgiving, in miniature. I hadn't noticed that
before, but boy did it give me shivers when I watched the
rerun.
6. Crazy Angel. (All right, he's not actually present in
season three, but does anyone think Angel won't be crazy, at
the start of season 4?)
7. The blue lighting of Crazy's angel's room reminded me of
the final scenes in Tomorrow, not so much because of the
color but because the quality of the light (like the
heavenly Cordy beams and the light filtering through ocean
water around Angel's box).
Also, few extra bits which might not count as
foreshadowing:
1. Wes kicks butt with a sword (a la Waiting in the
Wings).
2. The CGI monster summoned at 171 Oak looked suspiciously
like the one Groo and the gang kill in Couplet. :)
3. The appearance of Skip (who was from accounts intended to
be a one-shot character) and of course floating Cordy. (I
suspect David Greenwalt had the whole Cordy ascension in
mind from early on, so that the levitation was reverse-
engineered as groundwork.)
I guess some of the similarities could just be because the
production and design staff kept the designs for later stuff
consistent with what they'd done before (like the
pentagram). Still, I was amazed by how this one episode set
up so many of the visuals important later in the season.
Will Firefly become a Blatant Rip of Dear Favorite
Scifi shows? -- neaux, 16:53:09 07/21/02 Sun
You could say I just wrote that subject heading for some
attention.. but It makes me very very worried.
I know Joss likes to play homage to other shows and
movies... but everytime I see that damn promo on Fox for
Firefly.. it looks like such a big rip-off of Outlaw Star it
makes me want to cry. From what I understand of the show it
even sounds like it might be a rip-off of Cowboy Bebop.
I would love for someone to explain to me that what Joss is
doing is creating something new.. but from the specific
clips shown in the trailer..
i.e. of the naked girl in what looks like a suitcase.
I pray that is not the case.. because that is exactly how
"Melfina" appeared in Outlaw Star.
I have the outlaw star artbook and can scan in the image in
question if anyone needs me to.. so someone please shut me
up. >_<
[>
Re: Will Firefly become a Blatant Rip of Dear Favorite
Scifi shows? -- Miss Edith, 17:43:55 07/21/02 Sun
It does look a bit dull. And I have to laugh when there is
so much hype about it being anti-Star Trek. Not only did
that piss off potential viewers but that is hardly a new
idea. Personally I'll stick to Farscape. Anyone who hasn't
watched it it's on great form at the moment.
[> [>
Re: Will Firefly become a Blatant Rip of Dear Favorite
Scifi shows? -- parakeet, 22:13:18 07/21/02 Sun
I certainly agree about Farscape, an excellent show. Even
when it looks like they're venturing into cliched territory,
it pays off, and they certainly aren't venturing into
cliched territory this season. After Buffy, it's my
favorite show (Angel comes a close third).
I haven't seen the promos for Firefly, but, despite my
admiration for Mr. Whedon, my expectations aren't too high.
I hate too say it, but the odds are really against it living
up to Buffy and Angel. I mean, Buffy and its spin-off are
great because of a number of factors (Mr. Whedon, the cast,
the other writers and directors, a fresh feeling, and a
beautifully ridiculous name). I hope I'm being pessimistic,
but my doubt remains. We'll see.
[> [>
Re: Will Firefly become a Blatant Rip of Dear Favorite
Scifi shows? -- Amber, 12:06:08 07/22/02 Mon
I don't think its fair to judge the show based on the
promos. Remember Fox made the promos, not Joss. Basically
they take footage from the pilot and arrange it to look like
what they think will grab the audience's attention -- In
this case, it appears to be an intense, action-packed space
drama, but where's the quirky dialogue, where's the pain?
I'm sure all the usual Joss goodness is there, it just isn't
in the preview because Fox doesn't think it would attract an
audience.
If you have any doubt that promos lie, check out the
original Buffy commercial that's on the S1 DVD. It certainly
doesn't convey everything that's great about the show and if
all I'd had to go on was that preview I doubt I would have
become a Buffy fan.
[>
The thing is... -- Majin Gojira, 18:06:33
07/21/02 Sun
Few people watch those anime. I've seen them (More Outlaw
Star than Cowboy Beebop). and, is it such a bad thing?
Now, you can say "Yeah, but it got it's ideas from..."
You're freind's 'll be like "Huh, Really?"
And you say "Yeah, let me show you"
Then, you've rangled more Anime fans - and lord knows we
need more of them in the west. (Wait...maybe we
don't...)
[> [>
I just hold Joss to a more creative standard than..
-- neaux, 18:14:59 07/21/02 Sun
If you watch Joss in his own words on the firefly website..
he sounds as if he is showing us something "that hasn't
been seen on television in quite a while"
whatever.
is that why Cowboy Bebop and Outlaw Star made their way from
Japan to Cartoon Network for many many many Americans to see
last year?
I do agree with you though.. it could be a good thing. I
just want these shows to get the credit they deserve.
and you are right. Too many Otakus are a very scary thing
indeed. (shudders in fear)
[>
Re: Will Firefly become a Blatant Rip of Dear Favorite
Scifi shows? -- Robert, 23:07:34 07/21/02 Sun
>> "... it looks like such a big rip-off of Outlaw Star
..."
What is Outlaw Star?
[>
Hopefully, farther back than that -- fresne,
14:35:59 07/22/02 Mon
Well, if it makes you feel better, given the suitcase
scenario you describe, my first thought would be that Joss
is ripping off the story of how Cleopatra and Julius Caesar
first met. In which case, cool.
So, far I've been fairly intrigued with the descriptions.
Joss has specifically compared characters to Post Civil war
soldiers who have been pushed to the frontier because, well,
their side lost. These are people who fought for something
they believed in and unlike Buffy and Co, couldn't save
their world. Now they are without home, culture, country,
family.
It helps that the concept of the West and Westerns has
always intrigued me. I can't help it; dad grew up on a ranch
and on his side I'm a fifth generation Californian. The
Western is a rich place for someone as myth savvy as Joss to
mine. The West. A place where young men are exhorted to go,
the land of eternal youth, the land of the setting sun. A
liminal place, where identities may be lost and remade, but
whose time is finite. After all the Federated Empire to the
East is expansionistic, Manifest Destiny and all that.
So, if Firefly appears to be ripping off Outlaw Star and
Cowboy Bebop (I'm sorry, but I've never seen either), I can
only ask how much they themselves are based on the myth of
the American West.
Note: I'm trying to differentiate between the myth and the
reality of the American West because they are slightly
different animals.
[>
"We rip things off all the time" - David
Fury -- Rahael, 14:46:22 07/22/02 Mon
Just finished watching David Fury/James Contner's commentary
on Primeval (much food for thought within), and in it he was
talking about the Matrix effect when Willow decodes the
Initiative disc. He says "we rip things off all the time,
but we try to put a spin on it".
I am not at all familiar with the shows you mention, nor
have I seen the promo for Firefly.
And for comics fans, the UberBuffy was based on the comic
book heroine Promethea. Joss mentioned her when the story
was breaking, and David Fury went out and bought some of the
comics.
Foreshadowing in Primeval? -- Kerri, 22:11:59
07/21/02 Sun
I came home tonight in time to catch the majority of
Primeval, and I have to say that upon watching it two
years later it seem to have new meaning.
The spell that combined the Scoobies always struck me as odd
that Xander was the heart. I mean yes, he has heart, but so
does Buffy. She's always struck me as the one who was held
the group together, and its her heart and love and strength
that leads to so many of her victories. In fact it seem
that in many ways Buffy could have fulfilled each of the
four roles. And maybe that was the point.
Willow chants:
From the transcript:
The power of the Slayer and all who wield it. Last to
Ancient First. We invoke thee. Grant us thy domain of
primal strength. Accept us and the powers we
possess.
Link us mind and heart with spirit joined. Let the
hand
encompass us. Do thy will
From the shooting script:
By the generous will of the Ancients, the almighty power
of the Divine Spirits… Your supplicants humbly beseech thee
to behold us, and that which we possess… the moieties of the
One, the Avatar…
We enjoin that we may inhabit the vessel - the hand -
daughter of Sineya, First of the Ones.
In the spell Buffy acts as the body-the vessel where all
elements of the necessary slayer/warrior/hero/human being
join to create this perfect being who can defeat Adam.
I think the joining of all these elements (heart, mind,
spirit, and also the power of all the slayers and their
primal strength) within Buffy can be looked at in two
ways.
Part of Buffy's journey has been about accepting all of
herself. She must encompass the power of the slayers into
herself by accepting that element of herself. Buffy, as the
vessel in Pimeval, accepts the First Slayer and all
her power, but rejects her to some extent after the spell
has ended for fear of what it means about herself.
Buffy must also encompass Giles, Willow, Xander, and all the
the lessons they have to teach her within herself. She
needs to learn from them to complete her journey.
When Buffy became the slayer she was given strength-but
everything else must be found from within on her journey.
She was soley the hand, but then found mind, spirit, and
heart within. Again, connecting with the primal power of
the slayer-something Buffy has yet to fully do, but will be
found from within.
So is the whole spell, on some level, completely internal to
Buffy? Willow seems to say so much in the shooting script
version, calling Buffy the daughter of Siyena, first of
the Ones, and saying that heart, mind and spirit are
the moieties of the One, the Avatar (who one would
assume is Buffy (being as she was called th daughter of the
One and certainly seems to fit the description of
Avatar.
Now let's look at what happens when the spell is joined
(representing the completion of Buffy journey and the
joining of what is within, what is learned (from the other
Scoobies)-her human side, and the primal power of every
slayer). She becomes a better fighter-but that's to be
expected from joining with the primal power of all slayer.
More importantly, IMO, is that Buffy turns the bullets into
doves and makes Adam's machine gun retract. Yes, the slayer
fights and kills, but remember what Buffy learned in The
Gift...more importantly the slayer gives life. The
bullets become doves-symbolizing the bringing of peace and
life from hatred and agression, and isn't this what Buffy
strives to do? And in many ways what she does in The
Gift?
In shadowkat's essay on Restless she writes, "An enormous
amount of energy flows through our hands - energy to heal,
to create, to balance, to communicate, and to transform."
The healing power of the Hand is only enhanced when the
other elements are added making Buffy complete (hence the
birds), as she is in The Gift.
One more connection to The Gift. When Buffy floats
the uranium core in her hand it disappears in a flash of
white light that expands then contracts, much as the portal
did when she died.
Could Primeval be a huge chunck of foreshadowing for The
Gist? It would make sense since at that point that's
all Joss knew the series would go till. Or maybe it
foreshadows further-afterall Buffy has yet to encompass the
Slayer fully into herself. And I can't help thinking of
Fray and what we are told about the last slayer-
closing the portal and bringing peace to the world.
Granted I could be way off here and completely overanalyzing
. What do you think?
[>
Excellent points -- Rahael, 02:32:32 07/22/02
Mon
I haven't as yet watched the commentary for 'Primeaval' on
my DVD (I know!! Work stress).
Will watch it tonight, and come back with any insights David
Fury decided to share with us.
[>
Re: Foreshadowing in Primeval? -- Cactus Watcher,
03:01:17 07/22/02 Mon
I have a few questions perhaps someone or no one can answer.
First who or what is Sineya? Is that indeed the name of the
first slayer as the chant implies directly or is it the name
of figure of power behind the slayers?
Second, the wording concerning the moities is not in the
broadcast version, so the second question will be even more
esoteric. If I remember my anthropology correctly, a moiety
always refers to a two-way division. Did the author of the
script use the word incorrectly as Kerri implies, or is
there some structure of two-way divisions I'm not
seeing?
A Friday Topic Revisited: Buffy's responsibility to
self -- Arystocrat, 07:54:49 07/22/02 Mon
I wasn't able to get back to the board over the weekend so I
missed the chance to respond to the responses to my post,
which responded to Shadowkat's great 3 part essay about
Buffy as Hero/Slayer and misunderstanding.
Sorry for the revisit if the topic is a dead one, but I just
wanted to clarify a couple of my own ideas in my original
post.
First I do appreciate that Law school and "Doctor School"
are hard work. I used those examples in my post as an
extreme to try to illustrate that Buffy is not restricted
from doing things in her life by any specific doctrine or
sacred rite. If she wanted to find a way to try to juggle
school and Slaying and Dawn then she could try to work it
out. (I'm still a little unclear as to the reason that
Dawn's father bears no responsibility either financially or
emotionally in any of this, but I'll just skip over that
since it seems to be a point that ME want us to not
concentrate on.)
My broad point was that Buffy (in my opinion) takes no real
responsibility for her life outside of being the Slayer. I
do realize that this was intrical to the plot of season 6,
but this has been an on going issue that bugs me. Everyone
is responsible (especially at Buffy's age) to make their
lives what they want it to be. We all deal with the
limitations life gives us in our own way. Sure none of us
have to go out at night and save the world from the undead
(I don't think), but everyone is faced with challenges.
Being a Slayer makes Buffy a stronger person in all
respects, but so far I haven't seen her live up to the
potential of that strength outside of Slaying.
Life is what you make it. Be it school or just general
personal discovery we are responsible for becoming
adults.
The only other thing I wanted to clarify is that despite my
posting name (which was taken from the band name of my
Champions character) I am by no means an upper crust, high
life kind of person. Financially I'm just as broke as can
be. I was raised with a straight blue-collar upbringing. The
only aristocracy I lay claim to is an imaginary rock n' roll
band.
-Arys
Oh, and a PS about Champions: I, too, love the game. The
universe my husband and I run has been going unbroken for
over 20 years. When I realized that I felt a weird geeky
pride. :-)
[>
Re: A Friday Topic Revisited: Buffy's responsibility to
self -- Arethusa, 10:22:38 07/22/02 Mon
It's very true that everyone is responsible for their own
lives, and for becoming adult. But I'm still confused.
Just what is it that you expect Buffy to do that she hasn't
done or tried to do? I already responded with examples from
high school (Seasons 1-3). In Season 4 she adjusted to
university, started a new relationship, battled the
Initiative, Spike, and Adam, and experienced major shiifts
in her relationships with almost everyone in her life.
During Season 5 she began doing just what you suggested-
expand her understanding of and skills for slaying, in her
stepped-up training sessions with Giles. She also spent as
much time as she could with her ailing mother, helping to
care for Dawn. In Season 6 we did see Buffy avoid
responsibilities and not make the most of her abilities, but
that is clearly due to stresses that overwhelmed her, and
promises to change in Season 7, as we saw in the finale.
Buffy's options are not limitless, something ME went to
pains to point out in Xander and Dawn's conversation in
"Doublemeat Palace." (Quote by psyche)
DAWN: My friend Janice? Her sister's a lawyer.
XANDER: You think I should sue over the burger? That's
interesting.
DAWN: No, I just mean... (sighs) Buffy's never gonna be a
lawyer, or a doctor. Anything big.
XANDER: She's a Slayer. She saves the whole world. That's
way bigger.
DAWN: But that means she's gonna have like crap jobs her
entire life, right? Minimum wage stuff. I mean, I could
still grow up to be anything. But for her ... this is
it.
There's no rule that says Buffy can't do anything specific,
but everyone has limitations on their lives. Being the
slayer gives her some physical advantages but does it make
her stronger in all respects? Slayer responsibilites
actually made her comatose at one point.
You said Buffy is whiny, that she makes sure she can't live
a normal life. Can you give me examples of excessive and
irritating complaining, or anything that Buffy's done that
deliberatly subverts her chances for a normal life, besides
mistakes anyone might make?
Spike has a pretty good grasp of human nature, but his
relationship with truth, let alone Truth, is pretty shaky.
His whole persona is based on a lie. ("I've always been
bad.")
I shouldn't make assumtions about other posters. I
apologize for insinuating you're aristocratic. (First time
I've needed to say that!)
[>
Re: A Friday Topic Revisited: Buffy's responsibility to
self -- Vickie, 10:29:42 07/22/02 Mon
Arys,
In that earlier post, you said:
Being the Slayer doesn't really stop her from doing
anything except (for the moment at least) leaving Sunnydale.
She was going to school and stopped not because of Slaying,
but because her mom died. Something that could have happened
to anyone. If she tried, I'm sure she could find a way to go
back. Really she could become anything she wanted to be in
the daylight world, and maybe the lessons she learned as the
Slayer could help her. Can you imagine the power of a
Slayer/Lawyer? Or if she's so reconciled to being The
Slayer, couldn't she learn things that could help her with
her job? Private Detective skills? Demonology? Theology?
Or if she just wants to work couldn't she get a job better
than minimum wage? I mean, Angel Investigations manages to
work on some paying cases every now and then, what about
Scooby Investigations? Or she could be a bouncer at the
Bronze, lord knows they need one.
Really I guess all I'm saying is that I acknowledge that
Buffy makes sacrifices to save the world, but she also seems
to have stuck herself there as well. She only makes excuses
for not growing up and growing into the responsibility end
of the Slaying. She makes sure that she can't have a normal
life within the Slayer parameters. Really, it doesn't seem
to me that she's made any effort to do so. Before or after
her death.
A major theme of Buffy the Vampire Slayer is stated in the
teaser of The Gift: "But, you're only a girl." We've seen
Buffy save the world so often that we sometimes forget this
little thing. Buffy is only human.
So, let's see. She's 21, not academic (though very bright--
beat my SAT scores anyway), has no immediately applicable
job skills. She's starting from scratch.
Quite apart from the logistics nightmare of any of the paths
you suggest (try getting a PI license at 21 with no law
enforcement background and a history of violent behavior,
suspicion of murder twice....), Buffy is somewhat in shock.
Some have said clinically depressed--I cannot diagnose that
but according to the popular literature someone should get
her to a doctor and check. And clinical depression isn't
something you can just "snap out of" one day.
In the past two years she has 1) gained a sibling (with
complications), 2) lost her boyfriend, 3) lost her mother,
4) fought a god, 5) died to save her sister (and the world,
again), 6) come back from death. I'm sure I'm leaving things
out, but do you have any inkling where this would rate on a
stress meter? She's doing well just to keep on keeping
on.
Yes, eventually Buffy must make a life for herself in
addition to her slaying. Assuming she doesn't die young, as
every slayer has before her. But I really don't consider a
year too long to mourn her mother (let alone herself).
The fact is, slaying really does limit her, in that she must
go out every night and protect humanity. To survive that,
she really must train and keep in top form. Add to slaying
her responsibilities to Dawn, and she really has little time
(and probably no energy) for anything other than the
simplest of jobs. Certainly she cannot both work and go to
school. There are not enough hours in a day. And she cannot
go to school unless deadbeat Hank starts living up to his
responsibilities. No money.
In fact, I believe that the only thing you think Buffy
must do is the one thing not required of her. There
is no slayer requirement to live in Sunnydale. All the other
slayers have defended humanity where they were planted (so
to speak). Kendra was not sent from Jamaica to Sunnydale (at
least, not until the "dark power" was about to rise--and she
went home afterwards). Faith was not sent from Boston to
Sunnydale. When Buffy answered to the Council, Giles and
Wesley told her she had to stay, but that was the Council
party line, not any traditional obligation. The only reason
Buffy must stay in Sunnydale is her own perception
of the hazards of the Hellmouth.
I really think Dawn had it right. Buffy will never be
anything "big" in her day job, because her night job is too
big to allow much outside focus, development, or devotion of
time and energy. In that one scene in Doublemeat Palace,
Dawn starts to understand the sacrifices a slayer makes.
It's not just (just!) fighting and danger and not a lot of
sleep. It's also losing the possibility for a conventional
life (being a normal girl) and for professional development.
And it is also usually losing most of her years of life. The
Cruciamentum happens "if" a slayer reaches her eighteenth
birthday.
Certainly, we all are responsible for "becoming adults." But
that need not mean Buffy takes an academic or professional
path on top of her duty to defend humanity and her familial
responsibilities. It just means she needs to learn to cope
with what life hands her, and maintain her integrity while
doing so. I think we need to remember that learning to cope
does not always resemble actual coping.
MHO, of course. Take it and shred.
[> [>
Excellent points, Vickie and Arethusa -- Rahael,
10:45:17 07/22/02 Mon
In my opinion, Buffy has been growing up this season. It may
look like a rut, but she's learning huge life lessons.
(Vickie made a very valuable point that what looks like
coping and actually coping are two different things. I'd say
that Buffy was having rational responses to an irrational
situation).
Being only a couple of years older than her, I can remember
how stark everything seemed, but as I grew older, I realised
that the whole of my life lay before me, and I didn't have
to read everything, do everything, achieve everything by the
next year.
Worldly success, moreover, does not equate to a fulfilled or
ethical life. There is nothing wrong with the people who
work the hard jobs, earning the least pay. Someone is always
going to be stuck doing those jobs.
But I think the key point is this: Buffy, until Season 5 was
trying to go to University, do well in her studies. Her
leaving University was only temporary. The key thing is
this: She Died. She had no future. She didn't have to worry
about these things anymore. Except, she was ressurrected,
and tried manfully to work her way through a debt that had
accumulated while she was dead, a sister who was in trouble
in school and virtually no qualifications. No doubt, in the
long term, Buffy will figure out a way to manage better. She
tends to be pretty resourceful. Or the writers will try and
find a way around the no qualifications thing!
[> [> [>
"manfully"? LOL Is this an interesting
Fruedian slip or a provocative insight? -- redcat,
11:03:14 07/22/02 Mon
[> [> [> [>
Actually, it's perfectly correct usage -- Tanker,
12:51:45 07/22/02 Mon
http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=manfully
[warning: highly opinionated English rant ahead]
Let's just get this out of the way: yes, the meaning is
sexist, or rather is based on sexist views. But what is
important is the actual meaning of the word. From the
Webster's entry in the above link: "brave, courageous,
resolute, noble." These are "manly" attributes. The fact
that we now accept that women are perfectly capable of
showing them is beside the point. They're what the word
means, and thus Rahael used it correctly.
This reminds me of the flap over Maryland's state motto,
"Manly Deeds, Womanly Words." The point of which is that
BOTH were considered good things. It's the meaning behind
them that matters, not the sexist construction.
Yeah, I know that people will vehemently disagree with me.
Just remember Godwin's Law. :-)
[> [> [> [> [>
Welcome back, Tanker! We've missed you! --
d'Herblay, 13:44:20 07/22/02 Mon
However, I think redcat was commenting on the irony of Rah
using "manfully" to describe Buffy during the Spuffy arc. I
suppose it would be a clearer Freudian slip to minds other
than redcat's (which is, admittedly, in the gutter) had she
written "Except, she was resurrected, and tried vampfully to
work her way through a debt that had accumulated while she
was dead," or "Except, she was resurrected, and tried,
cocksure, to work her way through a debt that had
accumulated while she was dead," or "Except, she was
resurrected, and tried, whilst being penetrated by 10 full
inches of undead love machine, to work her way through a
debt that had accumulated while she was dead." Generally,
however, Rah is much more concise.
Sorry, I owed rc an irony warning!
[> [> [> [> [> [>
BWAHAA! That was too funny! -- ponygirl (not
telling my co-workers why I'm laughing), 13:58:03
07/22/02 Mon
[> [> [> [> [> [>
ROFLMAO -- Sophist, 16:26:37 07/22/02 Mon
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Welcome back, Tanker! We've missed you! --
Tanker, 18:27:32 07/22/02 Mon
You mean someone remembers me? I'm impressed.
As usual, my irony detector is non-functional (so why I even
try to read this board is a mystery), so I missed that
meaing of "manfully" altogether. Still, it was used
correctly. Now I have to try to go smooth things out down
thread.
[> [> [> [> [>
Them's fighting words... -- Arethusa, 13:57:32
07/22/02 Mon
I'm feeling manfully argumentative today, so let the fur
fly:
The fact that someone can talk about how women are "capable
of showing" "manly" attributes shows how strong notions of
gender-based characteristics are. You don't state "women
have these attributes, too;" you say they are "capable" of
"showing" them-very condescending words that infer these
characteristics are not intrinsic to women. Now, I do *not*
accuse you of any sexism whatsoever (and of course, not
Rahael). But I know men who, right now in 2002 C. E., still
think women are incapable of such emotions or actions as
loyalty, bravery, self-sacrifice, or idealism. It's not in
them. They are maternal, nurturing, blah, blah-but they are
not capable of thinking or feeling anything that requires
abstract reasoning or emotion, anything that does not
directly relate to them. The oppression of women is a
fundamental part of too many societies, including pockets of
ours, to assume we no longer need to discuss these issues.
Look at abortion, if you want to poke a fire ant hill with a
sharp stick. People are still debating if it's wrong or
right, ignoring the main issue-men deciding the fate of
women.
Sexist construction is important. The words we use give
shape to our ideas. If the words aren't there the ideas
can't be there either-or so some say. Also, if words are
corrupted with hateful, negative connotations, the words are
no longer innocuous, and neither is their use. The sexual
abuse of children, usually girls, rape, denial of
educational and economic opportunities, prostitution,
slavery, mutilation, physical abuse, demands of moral and
emotional subordination to men by religions-these are ways
of life for far too many people. And by "people" I mean
"women."
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Woops -- Arethusa, 14:06:58 07/22/02 Mon
I always edit anything I think is inflammatory from my
posts, but somehow the above was posted before I edited it.
I apologize if I offend anyone.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Re: Woops -- Tanker, last post ever., 19:02:55
07/22/02 Mon
I suffer from poor word choice. I DO believe that those
"manful" attributes are inherent in women, which is what I
should have said.
I am incapable of explaining myself any further without
being misinterpreted, and I'm sorry I said anything.
There's a damn good reason that I almost never post on this
board. I haven't the educational background or the writing
ability to participate. If it's any consolation, I'm
feeling extremely stupid right now. I will stick to lurking
from now on.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Apologies again, Tanker -- Arethusa, 19:51:17
07/22/02 Mon
Like I said, I (almost) always tone down my posts when they
get confrontational or emotional. I goofed, and hit the
"send" button twice, or something. I try very hard to never
make an attack personal, and I knew very well (and tried to
say so) that you meant nothing negative. I frequently feel
uneducated and inept when reading some of the great posts
here, but I discovered that there's room here for me too,
even when I stupidly antagonize nice posters who I really
just wanted to discuss things with.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Cut the crap, Mike -- d'Herblay, 20:19:35
07/22/02 Mon
I've admired your too few posts since August, and while I do
not know what your academic background is (though I've been
more impressed by the posts of some of our blue-collar
friends than by some of our college professors [not you, CW!
you're peachy]), I do know that you in no way lack the
writing ability to hang with the big guns here. You missed a
bit of irony, you provoked discussion, it happens. (I myself
have been jumping a little too hastily, and a little too
cavalierly in word choice, into the breach these past few
days.) So stop po' mouthin' yourself -- you only get one
"No! Don't leave the board!" out of me -- and get posting
again, you little chicken.
What? You want someone to serenade you with "Pinhead"?
By the way, anyone who uses the phrase "last post ever" owes
my girlfriend fifty cents in royalties.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
As dH playfully points out, greater things have been
lived down here -- Rahael, 00:26:17 07/23/02 Tue
A misunderstanding is surely too small a matter to go back
to lurking. Now huge fiery debates, that's another matter,
LOL.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
LOL! Poll:How many of us have threatened to leave?
-- shadowkat, 06:37:57 07/23/02 Tue
Been wondering how many of us have threatened to leave
after getting slammed for saying something?
I know I did twice.
Stay Tanker. I get in trouble all the time for making
historical and literary and psychological errors - just
ask the other posters...
I think my last one was Henry (the Eighth), or was it
the name post?
[> [> [> [> [> [>
I agree with you -- Rahael, 14:17:31 07/22/02
Mon
I had an unusual background. In a sociology class early in
my English education, we were asked to divide up words to
associate with men and women.
I instinctively placed "aggression" with women (in the most
positive sense, as a kind of primal energy), and gentleness
with men (my father is the most gentle man I know). I was
rather startled to find that no one else had placed words
that way!
I just find it hard associating any of these words with men
or women exclusively anymore, and this isn't an
afterthought, it's my instinctive thought.
I do like to use the word 'manfully' with a twinkle of irony
though!
Arethusa, you certainly didn't cause me any offence. I
heartily agree.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Gosh, I was sure I wrote "LOL" in my
post... -- redcat, cleaning her glasses and muttering
"oh, dear", 18:32:21 07/22/02 Mon
(Dear all, Please read in the mildest mental-vocal tone
possible - thanks.)
Hmmm. I just thought I was giggling along with Rah about
what I was *pretty* sure (but not absolutely sure, hence
the
interrogatory nature of the subject line) was the conscious
choice of a subtle, interesting, witty, ironic comment,
both on the nature
of the meaning of the word in terms of it’s applicability to
Buffy when considered in an “objective” (dictionary-
definition-type) way,
and on the irony of it’s etymological history as it seems to
be developing in a (not-at-all)-post-feminist world. I
thought that if it
*was* intentional, given the many layers at which the word
can operate, it was a “provocative” insight. It certainly
provoked me to
giggle out loud, which I was pretty sure was Rah’s intent.
(But again, I wasn’t absolutely sure -- and if it *had*
been a Freudian slip,
I thought she’d probably get a good laugh out of that being
pointed out, too.)
Just didn’t expect the vehemence my comment caused
here...
And Rah, I will never read the word “manfully” again without
hearing a delightful “twinkle of irony” in my head.
I'm just GOL [giggling out loud] (hopefully) along with
'ya.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [>
Me too! -- Rahael, 00:29:12 07/23/02 Tue
Especially after dH's post.
There's a lot of this glass cleaning going around!
[>
Re: A Friday Topic Revisited: Buffy's responsibility to
self -- Rendyl, 11:40:04 07/22/02 Mon
There is also another point to consider. Buffy -is- the
Slayer. We on the board sometimes get caught up in all the
metaphorical aspects of that and forget the very literal
problems associated with it.
No job, no class, no career is ever going to come before her
slaying duties. She will always need to be able to drop
everything with no notice and go save the world. There are
many fields where that kind of flexibility is impossible.
And I agree with some of the comments made. She has only
been back alive a short time. Getting back into the flow
may take a little longer.
Ren
[>
Re: A Friday Topic Revisited: Buffy's responsibility to
self -- Sofdog, 14:02:34 07/22/02 Mon
I too find the absence of Hank Summers extremely absurd. The
only explanation I've figured is that the spell around Dawn
is a glamour that takes effect when you're in her presence.
People who've never met her, don't know who she is.
Somewhere in the world Hank Summers is being a jerk to
Buffy, who probably hasn't mentioned Dawn since Hank
wouldn't know who she is.
Just a thought.
[> [>
Hank Summers -- Dochawk, 22:16:20 07/22/02
Mon
I agree with you, it is extremely upsurd, but unfortunately
your explanation doesn't help. In "The Weight of the World"
Buffy remembers Hank and Joyce bringing little Dawn home and
in Bargaining Part I" the gang doesn't want Buffybot to
answer the phone because they are afraid Hank will want to
take Dawn away from them, so Hank must know about and have
some communication with Dawn. I can understand a deadbeat
dad letting Dawn live with Buffy, but there ought to be some
money there, if only out of guilt.
[> [> [>
He's dead, Doc -- Vickie, 10:10:30 07/23/02
Tue
JOKE folks!
Seriously, the only way I can make sense of Hank's continued
absence is that something has happened to him. This is pure
speculation, but wouldn't it be classic Whedon if Buffy had
to stake her dear old dad?
[> [> [> [>
I love Lady Starlight explanation in a fanfic :) --
Ete, 17:25:47 07/23/02 Tue
Lavendar Blue in the fictionnary center
[> [> [> [> [>
Hardly an explanation -- Vickie, 19:04:07
07/23/02 Tue
Nice evocative little ficlet, though.
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Thank you both. <g> -- LadyStarlight,
05:43:18 07/24/02 Wed
[> [> [> [> [> [>
Spoiler for that fic -- Etrangere, 09:31:02
07/24/02 Wed
My interpretation from reading the fic was that the woman
was some kind of siren or something like that who enraptured
Hank, hence the explanation.
Not you ?
A Midsummer Night's Shakespeare Parody (LONG) -- lindabarlow, 15:19:03 07/22/02 Mon
Folks, with your indulgence: I don't post here often (last
time, I think, was when I posted my analysis of "Normal
Again") but someone suggested I share this with you. It's
obviously based on the recent speculation about possible
season 7 parallels to A Midsummer Night's Dream ;)
Most of the speeches from Act 1, scene 1 are in here (except
the Theseus and bride scene that begins the play). Some
subtracted, some changed, and a bunch of added stuff.
For the real text check out:
http://the-
tech.mit.edu/Shakespeare/midsummer/midsummer.1.1.html
A Midsummer’s Nightmare, with apologies to Will, the Poet,
Shakespeare:
ACT ONE – The Palace of Joss
JOSS
Thanks, good Rupert: what's the news with thee?
GILES
Full of vexation come I, with complaint
Against my ward, my stubborn Vampire Slayer.
Stand forth, good Xander. So, my noble lord,
This man hath my consent to marry her.
Step forward, William: and my gracious Joss,
This demon hath bewitch'd the bosom of my girl;
And other nameless parts of her as well.
Thou, Bloody Spike, hast made her honeyed rhymes,
Which, though hardly fit for human ears,
Have won her heart with false claims and pretense
That thou hast against all chance obtained thy soul
Thou hast ‘changed body fluids with her, and by
The moonlight at her window sung,
And through her window dragged thy death-cold flesh
To feast upon her warm and foolish throat.
With silly verses thou hast feigned thy love,
And stolen the impression of her fantasy
With bracelets of thy hair, rings, demon hearts,
Knicks, knacks, hot cocks, orgasms, messengers
Of strong prevailment in her tender youth:
With cunning hast thou filch'd my Slayer’s heart,
(Not to say her tits and ass and other parts),
Turn'd her obedience, which is due to me,
As her Watcher: and, so my gracious duke,
If she will not here before your grace
Consent to wed this noble carpenter,
Who may lack superpowers but still saved the world
When it was threatened by a whacked-out witch,
I beg the ancient custom of this town,
Since she is mine, I may dispose of her:
Which shall be either to our Xander here
Or to her death… In which case maybe I’ll
Have better luck by bossing Dawn around.
JOSS
What say you, girl? Please be advised, fair maid:
(Well, maybe maid’s the wrong term, after all)
To you your Watcher should be as a god;
And think not ‘cause you busted Glory’s ass
That you need not obey thy holy gods
Like Marti and the scribes, but mostly me.
Xander is a worthy gentleman.
I made him in my image – hence the dorky shirt.
BUFFY
So is Spike. He is worthy.
JOSS
Maybe so,
Now that he hast his soul returned to him
Not to mention the fawnings of the fans
Who lusted for his beauteous naked bod.
But lacking still your Watcher’s agreement,
This Xander must be held the worthier.
BUFFY
(gazing lustfully at Spike)
I would my Watcher look'd but with my eyes.
JOSS
Rather your eyes must with his judgment look.
BUFFY
I do entreat your grace to pardon me.
I know not by what power I am made bold,
Well… I do know – I’d rip your insides out --
Nor how it may concern my modesty,
In such a presence here to plead my thoughts;
But I beseech you please that I may know
The worst that may befall me in this case,
If I refuse to marry Xander… Eeew.
JOSS
Either to die the death or to abjure
For ever the society of men.
BUFFY
(Laughs hysterically)
JOSS
Therefore, fair Buffy, question your desires;
Know of your youth, examine well your blood,
Whether, if you yield not to your Watcher’s choice,
You can endure the livery of a nun.
BUFFY
How’s the food?
JOSS
And how much happier is the rose distill'd,
Than that which withering on the virgin thorn
Grows, lives, and dies in single chastity.
BUFFY
Hello? Angel. Riley. Spike. And Parker, too.
Go read the scripts, your Jossiosity.
JOSS
Take time to pause; and, by the next new moon--
The sealing-day ‘twixt UPN and me,
For everlasting bond of syndication --
Upon that day either prepare to die
For disobedience to Rupert’s will,
Or else to wed thyself with Xander,
(Assuming he won’t dump you at the church)
Or on Diana's altar to embrace
For e’er austerity and single life.
XANDER
Relent, sweet Buff: and, Evil Soulless Thing,
Yield thy crazed title to my certain bride.
SPIKE
Look, you bloody sod, I have a soul
And it’s as good as yours, you shriveled twit.
You have her Watcher’s love, I see --
Always wondered about you two --
Let me have Buffy’s: you can marry Giles.
GILES
Scornful Spike! true, he hath my love,
And what is mine shall rend him.
(Actually Shakespeare said “render him” but
I like the slashy vibe we’re building here…)
And she is mine, and all my right of her
I give to Xander, even if he is a wanker.
SPIKE
I am, my lord, as well derived as he --
Despite the trifling point of being dead --
As well possess'd; Ok, so yeah, no job
And, fine, no home, since you tore down my crypt
But still, my love is more than his;
I bleedin’ died to win my human soul
And now I live with William’s bloody rhymes
His guilt, his stupid hair and foppish clothes.
I mean, sod it, Joss, what’s it gonna take?
Some mercy for the fangy guy, ok?
Besides, she loves me now. Acourse,
She always had a thing for me, and once
We got it on and made the two-backed beast,
Buffy couldn’t keep her hands off my --
BUFFY
Spike!
SPIKE
I am beloved of beauteous Buff:
Why should not I then prosecute my right?
Harris, I'll charge it to his face,
Made love to Anya – ok, so did I -- but
He won her soul; assuming she still has one,
Which she might not, not that I’m one to talk,
Having lived a century free of such encumbrances,
But getting back to Anya …
She, sweet lady, dotes still upon this Xander
Loving this dim-witted and inconstant clod.
JOSS
I must confess that I heard that gossip, too,
And with Xander thought to have spoke thereof;
But, being over-full of self-affairs,
And being forced to re-write Firefly,
Lest the damn network condemn all my shows
Unto the garbage … My mind did lose it.
But, Alexander, come;
And you, too, Rupert; go with me,
I have some private schooling for you both.
I don’t mean Eton, nor will I harrow thee.
For you, fair Slayer, look you arm yourself
To fit your fancies to your Watcher’s will;
Else you will die or vow a single life.
BUFFY
So that’s different from my usual fate, how?
Exeunt all but SPIKE and BUFFY
SPIKE
How now, my love! why is your cheek so pale?
How chance the roses there do fade so fast?
Perchance you’re slaying way too many vamps…
Or did some vile thing get a taste of you?
BUFFY
Belike for want of rain, which I could well
Beteem them from the tempest of my eyes.
SPIKE
Huh? We’re alone now; speak English.
(Tilts his head and does the tongue thing)
Don’t listen to that sodding crap from Joss
No way he’s killing you again this year
It’s boring, pet, – sod this, you wanna shag?
(They rush into each other’s arms and clothes go flying as
they fall to the ground oblivious to everything else but the
INCREDIBLE SEX. Five hours later…)
SPIKE
Ay me! for aught that I could ever read,
Could ever hear by tale or history,
The course of true love never did run smooth.
BUFFY
That Shakespeare says the cutest things!
SPIKE
If I put that line in my poetry,
I’d get attacked for using a cliché.
BUFFY
O hell! to choose love by another's eyes.
SPIKE
Or, if there were a sympathy in choice,
War, death, or sickness did lay siege to it,
Making it momentany as a sound,
Swift as a shadow, short as any dream;
Brief as the lightning in the collied night,
That, in a spleen, unfolds both heaven and earth,
And ere a man hath power to say 'Behold!'
The jaws of darkness do devour it up:
So quick bright things come to confusion.
BUFFY
(Awed) Ok. We don’t change a line of that speech.
SPIKE
Check it out, luv:
I have a widow aunt, a dowager
Of great revenue, and she hath no child:
From Sunnydale her house is seven leagues;
No clue how far away that is, though, pet,
But she regards me as her only son.
That’s ‘cause I ate her real son, but let’s keep
That little secret just between us, luv.
There, Slayer, will I make my vows to thee;
And to that place the wankers at M. E.
Cannot pursue us. If thou lovest me then,
Steal forth from thy house to-morrow night;
And in the cemetery where we meet,
There will I stay for thee.
BUFFY
My dearest William!
I swear to thee, by Cupid's strongest bow,
Or by my super stake with sharpest point --
SPIKE
O swear not by thy stake, my love!
BUFFY
By Cupid’s arrow with the golden head,
By the simplicity of Tara’s doves,
May she rest in peace… By that which knitteth souls
Now that you have a soul to join with mine,
And by that fire which burn'd the Carthage queen,
When the false Troyan under sail was seen,
By all the vows that ever men have broke,
In number more than ever women spoke,
In that same place thou hast appointed me,
To-morrow truly will I meet with thee.
SPIKE
Come early and we’ll grab ourselves a shag.
Keep promise, love. Look, here comes Anyanka.
Enter ANYA
BUFFY
God speed fair Anya! whither away?
ANYA
Call you me fair? then fair again un-say.
Xander loves you now; may his cock fall off.
Your eyes are lode-stars; and your tongue's sweet air
More tuneable than lark to shepherd's ear,
Blah, blah, blah.
O, teach me how you scheme, and with what art
You sway the motion of my Xander’s heart.
SPIKE
(to Anya) You’re not still fretting over Xander, pet?
I thought I told you to forget that sod.
BUFFY
(Punches Spike in the face). Don’t remind me of that.
(to Anya) I frown on Xander, yet he loves me still.
ANYA
O that your frowns would teach my smiles such skill!
BUFFY
I give him curses, yet he gives me love.
ANYA
He even likes your curses better than mine??
BUFFY
The more I hate, the more he follows me.
ANYA
The more I love, the more he hateth me.
SPIKE
(rubbing his latest bruise) I can relate to that.
BUFFY
His folly, Anya, is no fault of mine.
ANYA
Oh, sure. When things get tough he
Hides behind his Buffy.
God, don’t you ever take responsibility for anything?
BUFFY
Take comfort: he no more shall see my face;
Spike and I will fly this place.
Before the time I did sweet William see,
Seem'd Sunnydale a paradise to me:
SPIKE
A bit of an exaggeration, luv.
BUFFY
O, then, what graces in my love do dwell,
That he hath turn'd a heaven unto a hell!
SPIKE
Er, wasn’t that Willow? Bringing you back and all…
SPIKE (cont)
Anya, to you our minds we will unfold:
To-morrow night, when Phoebe doth behold
Her silver visage in the watery glass,
Decking with liquid pearl the bladed grass,
A time that lovers' flights doth still conceal,
Now that is poetry! We’re getting out of town.
BUFFY
And in the wood, where often you and I --
Or maybe that was Willow – used to lie
Emptying our bosoms of our counsel sweet,
There my sweet William and myself shall meet;
And thence from Sunnyhell we’ll turn our eyes,
To seek new friends and demon companies.
Farewell, Anyanka: pray thou for us;
And give my best to D’Hoffryn when you do.
And good luck grant thee thy sweet Xander, too!
Keep thy word, Spike: we must starve our sight
From lovers' food till morrow deep midnight.
And don’t drink any blood first; it makes your kisses
taste weird.
SPIKE
You never minded my kisses before!
In fact--
Exit BUFFY
SPIKE (cont)
Bloody hell!
Anya, adieu:
As you on him, may Xander dote on you!
Exit SPIKE
ANYA
How happy some people can be!
Though, dammit, I am thought as fair as she.
But what of that? Xander thinks not so;
He will not know what all but he do know:
Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind;
And therefore is wing'd Cupid painted blind:
Nor hath Love's mind of any judgement taste;
Wings and no eyes figure unheedy haste:
And therefore is Love said to be a child,
Because in choice he is so oft beguiled.
Jeez! What’s a demon gotta do to win?
I tried to curse him, but I can’t begin
Before I chicken out; he doesn’t know
How close he came driving nails Below.
Ere Xander look'd upon the Slayer’s eyne,
He hail'd down oaths that he was only mine;
And when this ass some heat from Buffy felt,
So he dissolved, and showers of oaths did melt.
I’ll have revenge! If no one makes a wish
I’ll bait a hook for him, that slimey fish
I’ll tell him all about the Slayer’s flight:
Then to the wood will he to-morrow night
Pursue her; and for this intelligence
If I have thanks, it is a dear expense:
But herein mean I to enrich my pain,
To follow him thither and back again.
I love him, and I’m really, truly f*cked
So don’t be shocked if soon I end up pucked.
Exit ANYA
END Act One, scene one.
--Linda
[>
Thank you!! -- Rahael, 15:39:10 07/22/02 Mon
Loved this!
A very literary board today....
[> [>
Re: Just delightfully funny and on the mark! Pure
thumbs up! -- Brian, 16:04:32 07/22/02 Mon
[>
I wish you'd taught my high school English
classes... -- LadyStarlight, 16:13:10 07/22/02
Mon
...maybe I'dve learned something from them.
Great job.
[>
I can't remember the last time I laughed so hard!
Thank You! -- Dead Soul, 17:01:34 07/22/02 Mon
[>
Get thee to a Fic Corner! -- d'Herblay, 17:13:59
07/22/02 Mon
[>
Thank you for such a wonderful & fun post! --
Deeva, 17:26:15 07/22/02 Mon
[>
Encore! Encore! -- Arethusa, 19:41:47 07/22/02
Mon
[>
Huzah! and then, more, more! (NT) -- fresne,
22:14:55 07/22/02 Mon
[>
There's genius out there! -- Vickie, 22:33:51
07/22/02 Mon
Act One Scene two, please!
Followed by the rest. If you do one act by a couple of
weeks, doubtless someone could pick it up to perform at
WorldCon.
Maybe even the original cast???????
[> [>
Re: Thanks, everyone! -- lindabarlow, 00:30:05
07/23/02 Tue
Oh, jeez, wouldn't it be a hoot to do the whole thing? I'm
still going -- Act One, scene 2 is done (not ready to be
posted anywhere, though) and I'm about to move onto Act
2...
Thanks for the encouragement!
--Linda
[>
Re: A Midsummer Night's Shakespeare Parody (LONG) -
- Rufus, 22:50:18 07/22/02 Mon
I read this over at the Stakehouse..very good.
[> [>
Re: A Midsummer Night's Shakespeare Parody (LONG) -
- Vickie, 23:02:52 07/22/02 Mon
Puhleeese tell me you mean out loud. To other Buffyverse
nutcases like us???
[>
*APPLAUSE* -- Lyonors, 07:22:52 07/23/02 Tue
Wow Linda....I really needed a laugh. That has to be the
funniest thing I have read in ages. You
rock...please...keep on, this has the potential to get even
funnier!
Ly.
[>
Brilliant! -- ponygirl, 07:57:03 07/23/02
Tue
Current
board
| More July 2002